Work problem on winding up a cable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done in winding up a 300ft cable with a weight of 2.00 lb/ft. Participants are exploring the application of physics concepts, particularly in relation to work, force, and integration in the context of calculus and applied physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the equation W=Fd and the necessity of using an integral due to the changing weight of the cable as it is wound up. Questions arise about the correct formulation of force and the implications of using Hooke's Law.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the correct approach to the problem, with some participants suggesting the need for integration due to the non-constant force. Various interpretations of the force involved are being explored, and guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between linear weight and force.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a calculus-based physics problem, with discussions reflecting on the implications of using different units and the assumptions about the forces acting on the cable.

Dan350
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Find the work done in winding up a 300ft cable that weighs 2.00 lb /ft




W=Fd
W=$$\int F dx$$






My attempt

w=F*D
so W= (300ft)(2.00lb/ft)
W=600ft.lb

and


$$\int_0^{300}\!\ 2xdx$$


W=90,000 ft.lb

I'm taking Calc 2 and this is applied Physics problems.

Which of these answers is correct?
And Why?

Thanks in advance
Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation W=Fd only applied when F is constant. Because the force of gravity will decrease on the cable as you continue to pull it up (it will weight less the more your pull it up), you cannot use this equation. You do need to use an integral.

However, the force is not 2x. The force is the weight, which is the (linear density)*(acceleration due to gravity)*dL
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dan350 said:
Find the work done in winding up a 300ft cable that weighs 2.00 lb /ft




W=Fd
W=$$\int F dx$$






My attempt

w=F*D
so W= (300ft)(2.00lb/ft)
W=600ft.lb

and


$$\int_0^{300}\!\ 2xdx$$


W=90,000 ft.lb

I'm taking Calc 2 and this is applied Physics problems.

Which of these answers is correct?
And Why?

Thanks in advance
Cheers!

The second one. The force isn't constant as you reel in the chain. It gets lighter as more is reeled in. And for another thing (300ft)(2.00lb/ft) doesn't give you units of ft*lb.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
sonnyfab said:
The equation W=Fd only applied when F is constant. Because the force of gravity will decrease on the cable as you continue to pull it up (it will weight less the more your pull it up), you cannot use this equation. You do need to use an integral.

However, the force is not 2x. The force is the weight, which is the (linear density)*(acceleration due to gravity)*dL




So do I have to use the hooke's law to get the product of the integral?
F= Kx
letting F=2lb/ft and solve for k?
Or I would use 9.8 as an acceleration due gravity?
Thank again
 
Dan350 said:

So do I have to use the hooke's law to get the product of the integral?
F= Kx
letting F=2lb/ft and solve for k?
Or I would use 9.8 as an acceleration due gravity?
Thank again

You integrate force over the distance. The force depends on the amount of cable you have to yet to reel up. Hooke's law has nothing to do with this. And you don't need 9.8 m/s^2. That's a metric unit. You are working in lbs and ft. Your second solution with the integral of 2x is correct. Try and figure out why. F isn't 2lb/ft. F is 2lb/ft times number of feet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Dan350,
You need to know which force is doing the work (of in this case, which force work is being done against) to figure out what F is. Hooke's Law applies to "restoring forces" which pull objects towards an equilibrium position. The key point about Hooke's Law forces is that whether you are to the felt or right of the equilibrium point, or above or below it, the force points towards that point. Springs pull you back or push you forward, depending on which direction the equilibbrium point of the spring is, and as a result springs obey Hooke's Law.
Your problem has something pulling up a chain. So to figure out which force you are working against, you need to see which force is pulling in the other direction. You pull up and ______ pulls down. I think we can agree that _____ is gravity here.
So F = weight (measured in lb). However, you do not know weight. Instead, you are given (linear weight - or weight per unit length) which is weight/L, the weight divided by the length of the chain. F is not constant in your problem, because the L gets shorter as you continue to pull. The fact that the force is not constant tells you that you must use an integral (it is true that you must also integrate when you use Hookes Law, because F=kx, and so it is not constant but depends on x).

Mass = Linear density * Length, so you have F = (linear weight)*L. It is L that changes as the chain is pulled up, so you are integrating over dL. The smallest L (lower limit) is 0ft and the largest (upper limit) is 300ft.

[itex]\int_0^{300}\!\ (Linear Weight) * dL[/itex]

Linear Weight is 2 lb/ft. There is no x inside the integral here.
 
Sorry, I wasn't paying attention to the units. You do need an x inside the integral. The work is the integral of Fdx. You need to multiply mass/length*length to get F, so 2x*dx

Dr Peter Vaughan
BASIS Peoria Physics
 
sonnyfab said:
Sorry, I wasn't paying attention to the units. You do need an x inside the integral. The work is the integral of Fdx. You need to multiply mass/length*length to get F, so 2x*dx

Dr Peter Vaughan
BASIS Peoria Physics

Indeed it is. Though in these units it's weight/length * length=weight=force.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K