Work Problem: Spring and Friction, find final Speed

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating non-conservative work from friction, which was determined to be -8.82. The initial kinetic energy was calculated as 136.89, while the change in potential energy was 8.1216. The final kinetic energy was derived using the equation Ekf = W NC + Eki - change Ep, resulting in a value of 119.9484. However, the calculated final speed was 7.3014, which is lower than the expected 7.44, prompting a review of calculations. Participants emphasized the importance of including units in calculations to avoid errors and highlighted the need to consider variables in multiple contexts.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Ek=1/2mv^2 Ep=1/2 k (x)^2
First calculated non conservative work from friction using Ff=umg. Non conservative work was -8.82.

Initial kinetic energy, 1/2mv^2, was 136.89.

Change in potential energy, 1/2k(x)^2, was 8.1216.

Ekf-Eki+Change Ep=Work NC

Ekf=W NC+Eki-change Ep

=-8.82+136.89-8.1216=119.9484

Ekf=1/2mv^2, v=7.3014 but answer should be 7.44. I've confirmed there were no rounding errors by trying the same calculation all at once in the calculator (I still get 7.3).
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    7.8 KB · Views: 154
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your calculation for WNC.
 
TSny said:
Check your calculation for WNC.
Wouldnt it just be the friction force here, umg? This is 0.2*9.8*4.5=8.82. Friction force would be against it so it would also be negative.
 
JoeyBob said:
Wouldnt it just be the friction force here, umg? This is 0.2*9.8*4.5=8.82. Friction force would be against it so it would also be negative.
Force and work do not have the same dimensions. So, the work cannot equal the force.
 
  • Like
Likes JoeyBob
TSny said:
Force and work do not have the same dimensions. So, the work cannot equal the force.
So I use the distance its been compressed to find the work. Thanks.
 
JoeyBob said:
So I use the distance its been compressed to find the work. Thanks.
OK. Good. Note that you would have probably caught your error if you had included units in your calculations.
 
TSny said:
OK. Good. Note that you would have probably caught your error if you had included units in your calculations.
Its more that I wasnt open minded enough to use that variable for two things - I only saw it as part of the potential energy of the spring (the compression).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K