Work Problem: Spring and Friction, find final Speed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a work problem involving a spring and friction, focusing on calculating the final speed of an object. The participants are exploring concepts related to non-conservative work, kinetic energy, and potential energy in the context of mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate non-conservative work from friction and relates it to kinetic and potential energy. Some participants question the calculations for non-conservative work and suggest checking the friction force used in the calculations. Others raise concerns about the dimensional analysis of force and work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on calculations and encouraging the original poster to reconsider their approach. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the calculations, particularly regarding the use of units and the interpretation of variables.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of including units in calculations and the potential for misinterpretation when using the same variable for different purposes. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the definitions and relationships between force, work, and energy.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Ek=1/2mv^2 Ep=1/2 k (x)^2
First calculated non conservative work from friction using Ff=umg. Non conservative work was -8.82.

Initial kinetic energy, 1/2mv^2, was 136.89.

Change in potential energy, 1/2k(x)^2, was 8.1216.

Ekf-Eki+Change Ep=Work NC

Ekf=W NC+Eki-change Ep

=-8.82+136.89-8.1216=119.9484

Ekf=1/2mv^2, v=7.3014 but answer should be 7.44. I've confirmed there were no rounding errors by trying the same calculation all at once in the calculator (I still get 7.3).
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    7.8 KB · Views: 165
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your calculation for WNC.
 
TSny said:
Check your calculation for WNC.
Wouldnt it just be the friction force here, umg? This is 0.2*9.8*4.5=8.82. Friction force would be against it so it would also be negative.
 
JoeyBob said:
Wouldnt it just be the friction force here, umg? This is 0.2*9.8*4.5=8.82. Friction force would be against it so it would also be negative.
Force and work do not have the same dimensions. So, the work cannot equal the force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
TSny said:
Force and work do not have the same dimensions. So, the work cannot equal the force.
So I use the distance its been compressed to find the work. Thanks.
 
JoeyBob said:
So I use the distance its been compressed to find the work. Thanks.
OK. Good. Note that you would have probably caught your error if you had included units in your calculations.
 
TSny said:
OK. Good. Note that you would have probably caught your error if you had included units in your calculations.
Its more that I wasnt open minded enough to use that variable for two things - I only saw it as part of the potential energy of the spring (the compression).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K