Would an object appear frozen while crossing into the threshold

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cosmo Novice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Threshold
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of objects as they approach and cross the event horizon of a black hole, particularly focusing on the perception of these objects by outside observers. Participants explore concepts related to redshift, the emission of photons, and the implications of time dilation in the context of black hole physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that as an object approaches the event horizon, it appears to freeze from the perspective of an outside observer due to the effects of gravity and time dilation.
  • There is a consensus that the photons emitted by the object become increasingly redshifted as it nears the event horizon.
  • Some participants question whether, given infinite time, the last photon emitted by the object would eventually reach the observer or if it would become undetectable before that point.
  • One viewpoint suggests that while the object will never be completely gone, the emitted photons will eventually be redshifted to a point where they are undetectable in the visible spectrum, but may still be detectable in other wavelengths for a time.
  • Another participant argues that photons emitted after crossing the horizon cannot reach the observer, leading to a discussion about the implications of time dilation on the perception of these emissions.
  • There is a debate about whether the emission of photons ceases after crossing the horizon or continues, with some asserting that emission continues but becomes undetectable.
  • Participants discuss the fate of the object inside the horizon, with some suggesting that it ultimately leads to a singularity, which raises questions about the cessation of photon emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the redshift of photons and the perception of the object appearing frozen, but there are competing views regarding the emission of photons after crossing the event horizon and the implications of time dilation. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the fate of emissions and the nature of detection over time.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of light and time as they relate to black holes, as well as the dependence on definitions of detectability and the conditions under which observations are made.

Cosmo Novice
Messages
367
Reaction score
3
Just as a note I am new to these forums and this is my first post after reading for a little while, I have no technical expertise and am a complete layman. So any advice on posting is welcome.

From reading threads on these forums discussing properties of black holes and event horizons as I understand it when an object passes the threshold of the event horizon of a black hole it can no longer escape the gravity of the BH and neither can any photons. Subjectively for the object it would fall into the hole in an ordinary timeframe reference depending on the gravity of the BH. To an outside observer the object would appear frozen on the edge of the BH. I read that theoretically the image would be visible to an outside observer infinitely but surely at some point the last photon emmited by the object as it fell over the event horizon would reach the objective observer? Would the photons emmited become increasingly redshifted?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The photons are increasingly red shifted to the outside observer.
 
mathman said:
The photons are increasingly red shifted to the outside observer.

But theoretically if you could watch objectively for an immense amount of time in the order of magnitude of however long would be required you would eventually see it cross into the threshold or would it be redshifted to such an extent we cannot perceive it?
 
Cosmo Novice said:
But theoretically if you could watch objectively for an immense amount of time in the order of magnitude of however long would be required you would eventually see it cross into the threshold or would it be redshifted to such an extent we cannot perceive it?

Yes pretty much, you will never it cross the threshold but the image will red shift until the image is gone.
 
cosmik debris said:
Yes pretty much, you will never it cross the threshold but the image will red shift until the image is gone.
Well, technically, it will never be completely gone. In time, the image will be so redshifted that it is too faint to see in the visible. Then we might still be able to see it in the infrared, then later in the microwave, then later in the radio. At some point it will just be too difficult to detect at all, but it will never be completely "gone".
 
Chalnoth said:
Well, technically, it will never be completely gone. In time, the image will be so redshifted that it is too faint to see in the visible. Then we might still be able to see it in the infrared, then later in the microwave, then later in the radio. At some point it will just be too difficult to detect at all, but it will never be completely "gone".

Chalnoth I appreciate what you are advising (that the photons will become increasingly redshifted) until they are no longer detectable. At this point however, once the protons have redshifted to an extent thay are not detectable on the EMS at all then is this just a case that we can no longer detect the photons or that the photons are no longer being emmitted? At some point the last photon must cross the threshold of the EH? Even if this was to subjectively take a near infinite amount of time eventually (Given infinite timeframes) would the last photon reach the observer?

You say the object "will never be completely gone" but the protons traveling from the object prior to its entry into the EH are not infinite in amount, and although timescales tend towards the infinite at some point the image must be completely gone?
 
Cosmo Novice said:
Chalnoth I appreciate what you are advising (that the photons will become increasingly redshifted) until they are no longer detectable. At this point however, once the protons have redshifted to an extent thay are not detectable on the EMS at all then is this just a case that we can no longer detect the photons or that the photons are no longer being emmitted?
Well, it's not that they stop being emitted. Rather, the photons that are emitted at the time the object crosses the horizon arrive here after an infinite amount of time. So the photons that are emitted as the object was closer and closer to the horizon arrive later and later, after more and more time.

Cosmo Novice said:
Then all modern medicine You say the object "will never be completely gone" but the protons traveling from the object prior to its entry into the EH are not infinite in amount, and although timescales tend towards the infinite at some point the image must be completely gone?
Well, right. I was speaking in the classical approximation, not about discretized photons. So yes, if you take into account the fact that light is made up of photons, eventually the last photon will arrive. But for the most part the object in question will have become undetectable long before then (and, technically, we will have also all ceased to exist by that time too).
 
Chalnoth said:
Well, it's not that they stop being emitted. Rather, the photons that are emitted at the time the object crosses the horizon arrive here after an infinite amount of time. So the photons that are emitted as the object was closer and closer to the horizon arrive later and later, after more and more time.

So, they do stop getting admitted within the frame of the object that crossed the Horizon, but time is so incredibly dilated it appears they never stop getting emitted in our frame outside the Horizon. Is that correct?

However, they eventually get redshifted into oblivion anyhow.

Anyhow, I guess that's how I always understood, but wasn't sure if you guys were saying the same thing?
 
dm4b said:
So, they do stop getting admitted within the frame of the object that crossed the Horizon,
No, they don't stop getting emitted. They keep getting emitted. It's just that the photons that are emitted after horizon-crossing can never reach us.

dm4b said:
but time is so incredibly dilated it appears they never stop getting emitted in our frame outside the Horizon. Is that correct?
This is more or less accurate, yes. We only see the photons emitted before horizon crossing, but dilated so that the arrival of those photons is spread over infinite (or nearly infinite) time.
 
  • #10
Chalnoth said:
No, they don't stop getting emitted. They keep getting emitted. It's just that the photons that are emitted after horizon-crossing can never reach us.

Well, I just meant wouldn't they eventually stop getting emitted because the ultimate fate of everything inside the Horizon is the singularity? Once the said object is destroyed, no more emission.
 
  • #11
dm4b said:
Well, I just meant wouldn't they eventually stop getting emitted because the ultimate fate of everything inside the Horizon is the singularity? Once the said object is destroyed, no more emission.
Well, that happens a little bit after horizon crossing. What happens after horizon crossing is irrelevant to these considerations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K