Would it be feasible to make a chemical inertial confinement reactor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using chemical lasers for inertial confinement fusion (ICF) reactors. Participants highlight that while chemical lasers can produce high power output, they are inadequate for generating the extremely short, high-intensity pulses required to effectively focus on fusion pellets. The consensus indicates that current ICF systems rely on optical amplification not only to boost pulse power but also to shape the pulse for optimal target ignition, a capability that single-stage chemical lasers cannot achieve.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) principles
  • Knowledge of laser pulse shaping techniques
  • Familiarity with chemical laser technology
  • Basic concepts of optical amplification in laser systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of inertial confinement fusion (ICF)
  • Explore laser pulse shaping techniques and their applications
  • Investigate the limitations of chemical lasers in high-intensity applications
  • Learn about optical amplification methods used in current ICF systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in fusion energy, laser technology specialists, and engineers involved in the development of advanced laser systems for fusion applications.

askingask
Messages
92
Reaction score
10
So basically, instead of using large complex pumped lasers, we use chemical lasers that have insane power output. They are used to fuse a fusion pellet. The excess energy is collected and part of it is used to prepare the next batch of chemicals needed to run the laser. What would be the problems with that design and how could you design it better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
askingask said:
insane
Does that answer your question?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
You need extremely short high intensity pulses that can be focused on a tiny target. Chemical lasers are not a good choice for that.
 
mfb said:
You need extremely short high intensity pulses that can be focused on a tiny target. Chemical lasers are not a good choice for that.
Are chemical lasers not known for their high power output?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Does that answer your question?
🫠
 
askingask said:
Are chemical lasers not known for their high power output?

1730730972367.png


 
berkeman said:

I remember reading an article about how the UK is developing chemical lasers as anti missile systems
 
  • #10
askingask said:
Why do you need fs pulses? Would pressurizing the pellet over a longer time period not give better results?
Did you read the information in the ICF link I provided?
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
Did you read the information in the ICF link I provided?
I skimmed the text. Can you provide the page that you are talking about , it contains around 70 pages 😄
 
  • #12
askingask said:
I skimmed the text. Can you provide the page that you are talking about , it contains around 70 pages 😄
See pp. 59-60 for a short discussion about laser pulse shaping. They are experimenting with different pulse shapes to optimize the implosion and ignition of the target.

So it looks like the current ICF systems need the optical amplification to not just increase the pulse power, but to also shape the final pulse at the target. I don't think you can do all of that in a single stage chemical laser...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: askingask

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
27K