B Would it be feasible to make a chemical inertial confinement reactor?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using chemical lasers for inertial confinement fusion (ICF) instead of traditional pumped lasers. While chemical lasers can produce high power output, they struggle to generate the extremely short, high-intensity pulses required for effective fusion. Participants highlight the need for precise pulse shaping to optimize target implosion and ignition, which may not be achievable with a single-stage chemical laser. Concerns are raised about the limitations of chemical lasers in creating the necessary femtosecond pulses. Overall, the consensus suggests that chemical lasers may not be suitable for this application due to their inherent design challenges.
askingask
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
So basically, instead of using large complex pumped lasers, we use chemical lasers that have insane power output. They are used to fuse a fusion pellet. The excess energy is collected and part of it is used to prepare the next batch of chemicals needed to run the laser. What would be the problems with that design and how could you design it better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
askingask said:
insane
Does that answer your question?
 
You need extremely short high intensity pulses that can be focused on a tiny target. Chemical lasers are not a good choice for that.
 
mfb said:
You need extremely short high intensity pulses that can be focused on a tiny target. Chemical lasers are not a good choice for that.
Are chemical lasers not known for their high power output?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Does that answer your question?
🫠
 
askingask said:
Are chemical lasers not known for their high power output?

1730730972367.png


 
berkeman said:

I remember reading an article about how the UK is developing chemical lasers as anti missile systems
 
  • #10
askingask said:
Why do you need fs pulses? Would pressurizing the pellet over a longer time period not give better results?
Did you read the information in the ICF link I provided?
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
Did you read the information in the ICF link I provided?
I skimmed the text. Can you provide the page that you are talking about , it contains around 70 pages 😄
 
  • #12
askingask said:
I skimmed the text. Can you provide the page that you are talking about , it contains around 70 pages 😄
See pp. 59-60 for a short discussion about laser pulse shaping. They are experimenting with different pulse shapes to optimize the implosion and ignition of the target.

So it looks like the current ICF systems need the optical amplification to not just increase the pulse power, but to also shape the final pulse at the target. I don't think you can do all of that in a single stage chemical laser...
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
26K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K