- #31
flyingpig
- 2,574
- 1
If you are a physicist/mathematician and you are influential, chances are you will have something named after you. Money can't buy that right? Right...?
Would you rather be an influential mathematician/physicist or politican?
- Thread starter gaussianblur
- Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY
The discussion centers on the preference between being an influential mathematician or physicist, such as Einstein or Newton, versus being a politician like Obama or Henry Clay. Participants express a general disdain for politics, citing issues like corruption and the pressure of political power. Many emphasize the value of scientific understanding over political influence, while some argue that politicians can significantly impact funding for education and research. Ultimately, the conversation reveals a preference for intellectual pursuits over political ambitions.
PREREQUISITES- Understanding of influential figures in mathematics and physics, such as Einstein and Newton.
- Familiarity with political systems and the role of politicians in society.
- Knowledge of the impact of funding on education and scientific research.
- Awareness of philosophical debates regarding the nature of science and politics.
- Research the contributions of key physicists and mathematicians to modern science.
- Explore the relationship between political decisions and funding for scientific research.
- Investigate the ethical implications of political power and influence on society.
- Study the historical context of influential political figures and their impact on education policy.
This discussion is beneficial for students of political science, aspiring scientists, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and politics.