Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis in three-dimensional space. The correct parametric equations are established as x = 0, y = 0, and z = t, where t represents any real number. The symmetric equations are simplified to x = 0 and y = 0, indicating that both x and y coordinates remain constant at zero along the z-axis. Participants clarify misconceptions regarding the use of zero in denominators and emphasize the importance of vector representation in formulating these equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-dimensional coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with parametric equations
  • Knowledge of symmetric equations
  • Basic vector algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector representation of lines in 3D space
  • Learn about parametric equations in different contexts
  • Explore the implications of zero denominators in equations
  • Investigate the relationship between parametric and symmetric equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying geometry and algebra, as well as anyone interested in understanding the representation of lines in three-dimensional space.

lamerali
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

I'm not sure i am on the right track; here is my attempt to an answer.

[0, 0, z] where z can equal any number.

a = [0, 0, 1]
b = [0, 0, z]

Parametric equations

x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + tz

Symmetric equations
\frac{x - 0}{0} = \frac{y - 0}{0} = \frac{z - 1}{z}
0 = 0 = -1

I'm not certain that my attempt to this question is correct; if anyone can guide me in the right direction if needed i would be grateful!
Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parametric equations cannot contain the terms x,y,z on the RHS. So z = 1 + tz is not correct. Think in terms of vectors. We want to obtain the equation of a line for the z-axis in vector form: OP + t\vec{v} where v is the direction of the line and OP any point on the line.

For the 2nd one, take notes of the values of x,y along the z-axis.
 
so would the parametric equation for z = a_z + tb_z

and for the second one since the values of x and y are always equal to zero on the z-axis; would the symmetric equations be:

x = y = z
0 = 0 = \frac{z - a_z}{b_z}<br /> <br /> Thanks
 
What's a_z and b_z?
 
lamerali said:
Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

I'm not sure i am on the right track; here is my attempt to an answer.

[0, 0, z] where z can equal any number.

a = [0, 0, 1]
b = [0, 0, z]
Two points on the z axis are [0, 0, 1] and [0, 0, 2] but certainly not "[0, 0, z]" because z is not a specific number.

Parametric equations

x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + tz

Symmetric equations
\frac{x - 0}{0} = \frac{y - 0}{0} = \frac{z - 1}{z}
0 = 0 = -1

I'm not certain that my attempt to this question is correct; if anyone can guide me in the right direction if needed i would be grateful!
Thanks :)
 
ok so using the points [0,0,1] and [0,0,2] on the z-axis will i get the parametric and symmetric equations as follows:

parametric equations
x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + 2t

and the symmetric equations

\frac{x - 0}{0} = \frac{y - 0}{0} = \frac{z - 1}{2}
0 = 0 = \frac{z - 1}{2}

is this anywhere near correct?
Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well your parametric equations looks ok, though more complicated than necessary. The Cartesian equations (what you name "symmetric") doesn't appear correct.
 
lamerali said:
ok so using the points [0,0,1] and [0,0,2] on the z-axis will i get the parametric and symmetric equations as follows:

parametric equations
x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + 2t
x= 0, y= 0, z= t describes exactly the same line.

and the symmetric equations

\frac{x - 0}{0} = \frac{y - 0}{0} = \frac{z - 1}{2}
0 = 0 = \frac{z - 1}{2}
Well, first, (x-0)/0 and (y- 0)/0 are NOT equal to 0! Multiply the entire set of equations by 0.

is this anywhere near correct?
Thanks
the "symmetric equations" describing the z axis are x= y= 0.
 
Great i think i got it!
THANKS! :D
 
  • #10
Im struggling with this problem as well. I got parametric no problem, but I don't quite understand how to put the symmetric equation on paper. Also, I thought that symmetric equation only exists when the denominator does not equal to zero. How exactly would I write out the equation. Thanks
 
  • #11
The denominator of what, to be exact? There shouldn't be any denominator equating to 0.
 
  • #12
ugeous said:
Im struggling with this problem as well. I got parametric no problem, but I don't quite understand how to put the symmetric equation on paper. Also, I thought that symmetric equation only exists when the denominator does not equal to zero. How exactly would I write out the equation. Thanks

If in setting up the formulas "blindly", you get
\frac{x- 0}{0}= \frac{y- 0}{0}= \frac{z-1}{2}
Then, because you can't have a "0" denominator, as Defennder said, you must have x-0= 0 and y- 0= 0. Of course, that gives you nothing for the "(z-1)/2" to be equal to so the equations are simply x= y= 0.
 
  • #13
Okay I see. Just to make it clear for me, say you had an example where you symmetric equation was (x-1)/2=(y-2)/3=(z-4)/0 would that mean the final equation is (x-1)/2=(y-2)/3=z?

Thanks again!
 
  • #14
No, why would you think so? That contradicts what Defennder and I just said! Because you cannot divide by 0, you must have z-4= 0 or z= 4. The equations for the line are (x-1)/2= (y-2)/3 and z= 4. Taking the joint value of (x-1)/2 and (y-2)/3 as t, that would correspond to parametric equations x= 1+ 2t, y= 2+ 3t, z= 4.
 
  • #15
Indeed it does! haha. I wrote that comment around 1am..just about time my brains stopped working haha. I understand what you mean. Thanks for you help guys! I can see clearly now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K