Writing an article for The Astrophysical Journal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of writing a paper for The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ), specifically focusing on obtaining a suitable LaTeX template for the journal's two-column format. Participants share their experiences and resources related to formatting and author guidelines.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a sample LaTeX file in the two-column format for the ApJ, expressing frustration with the quality of available examples.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster could obtain a template from their professor, implying that it would be more reliable.
  • A different participant points out the existence of author instructions for the ApJ, providing links to the relevant resources, but the original poster indicates these do not meet their specific needs.
  • One participant mentions the AASTeX package, noting that while it does not default to a two-column format, there is a style option for it, and they provide links for further information.
  • Another participant critiques the notion of prioritizing aesthetics in the formatting of the paper, arguing that the focus should be on producing a document that is easy to review rather than visually appealing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to obtaining a suitable LaTeX template, with some suggesting personal resources while others emphasize the importance of adhering to the journal's guidelines over aesthetic considerations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the specific requirements for the two-column format in the ApJ, as well as differing opinions on the importance of visual presentation versus functionality in the drafting process.

Adoniram
Messages
93
Reaction score
6
Hello all,

I have been tasked with actually writing my own paper for the ApJ, rather than just submitting my results to my professor and letting him do the work. So, my question is this: Is there a place where I can get a sample tex file from the ApJ? I've seen many crap example files, but none in the 2-column format, and it would really make my life a lot easier to have a working tex file to follow as an example...

Thanks for any help you can provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure it's available, but it would probably be easier to just get one from your professor since he'll surely have it around.
 
I've actually been through all that, including many links in from where you pointed. At first glance, it appears helpful, and it is for most journals but not for a 2-column ApJ format one. Thank you though!
 
Doesn't the AASTeX package take care of the two-column format for you?

http://aas.org/publications/aastex

(added) I see it doesn't do two columns by default, but there's a style for it. See "two-column preprint" here:

http://aas.org/aastex/aastex-package-manuscript-preparation#style_options

Also see the emulateapj class listed in section 4 of this page:

http://aas.org/latex-resources/some-helpful-tex-hints

Disclaimer: I've only dabbled a little bit with TeX myself, so for detailed help with using these you'd best ask in our Math and Science Software forum.
 
Last edited:
Adoniram said:
I've seen many crap example files, but none in the 2-column format.
Those "crap" example files are exactly what you should produce. Your goal as an author isn't to produce something that looks pretty. Your goal is to produce something that is easy to review. A 2-column format that has little white space is anything but easy to review. Easy to review and ugly to the eye are close to synonymous.

What makes something look pretty/readable -- that's a human factors skill that is pretty much orthogonal to what you know as an astronomer/physicist/astrophysicist. It is not your concern. The ApJ says exactly that: "The expenditure of great effort to adapt copy and markup for two-column pages is counterproductive. Remember that the main goal of this package is to produce draft-, or referee-, format pages. It is the responsibility of the editors and publishers to produce publication-format papers for the journals."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K