- #1
wmac
- 20
- 0
Hello everyone,
I recently finished my PhD and I have started publishing my new results.
I have a very good paper that builds the background for several others. I submitted the paper to the 2nd important journal in my field and after 2 months none of the 3 reviewers responded and the journal rejected the paper on the ground that they do not have reviewers!
Anyway it is getting too long:
- I am worried that through the several review processes the content gets published by an unauthorized person (something that happened before and I hesitate to call names).
- I want to publish the papers that are dependent on the main one but I do not want or can put the content of the main paper into the new ones. The main paper is long enough and the rest are long too.
The questions:
1- Is it proper to make the draft of my main article available on arXiv even before submission to the (elsevier) journal? Should I remove it after it gets published in the journal?
2- What are the legal/ethical/academic/* implications (cons and pros)?
Thank you for your help.
I recently finished my PhD and I have started publishing my new results.
I have a very good paper that builds the background for several others. I submitted the paper to the 2nd important journal in my field and after 2 months none of the 3 reviewers responded and the journal rejected the paper on the ground that they do not have reviewers!
Anyway it is getting too long:
- I am worried that through the several review processes the content gets published by an unauthorized person (something that happened before and I hesitate to call names).
- I want to publish the papers that are dependent on the main one but I do not want or can put the content of the main paper into the new ones. The main paper is long enough and the rest are long too.
The questions:
1- Is it proper to make the draft of my main article available on arXiv even before submission to the (elsevier) journal? Should I remove it after it gets published in the journal?
2- What are the legal/ethical/academic/* implications (cons and pros)?
Thank you for your help.