Writing Parametric Equations from Cartesian Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of converting Cartesian equations into parametric equations, particularly for complex functions where both x and y have indices. While simple cases like y=f(x) can be easily parameterized as x=t and y=f(t), more complicated equations, such as f(x,y)=0, require a more nuanced approach. The general method involves defining x and y in terms of a parameter t, such as x=g(t) and y=h(t), but the effectiveness of this parameterization depends on the specific function and its intended application. It is noted that while parameterization is always possible, it may not always be useful, emphasizing the importance of context. Overall, the conversation highlights the lack of standard methods for parameterizing Cartesian equations, suggesting that the approach varies based on the situation.
Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1
What is the general method for writing Cartesian equations as parametric equations?

For something as simple as y=f(x) we can write x=t and y=f(t) with the same function, but what about something more complicated, generally f(x,y)=0 - how can we make 2 parametric equations to represent a case where, for instance, both x and y have indices (neither 0 nor 1) in the Cartesian equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Big-Daddy said:
What is the general method for writing Cartesian equations as parametric equations?
I don't think there is one. There are lots of ways to parameterise a relation.

For something as simple as y=f(x) we can write x=t and y=f(t) with the same function, but what about something more complicated, generally f(x,y)=0 - how can we make 2 parametric equations to represent a case where, for instance, both x and y have indices (neither 0 nor 1) in the Cartesian equation?

put: x=g(t), y=h(t) then f(t)=f(g(t),h(t)) is the parameterization.

The details depend on the type of function and what you need the parameterization for.
 
Ok, firstly, is it always possible to write a couple of parametric equations x(t), y(t) for any Cartesian equation in x and y?

Could you provide some links on how to convert from Cartesian to parametric equations?
 
You can always parameterize a function but you cannot always do so usefully.
i.e. say that z=f(x,y) represents the height of a terrain above a reference level ... what would be a useful parameterisation?

Depends on what you want to do with it right?

Usually you start out by parameterizing curves.
You can think of the parameter as a time value and the parameterization is the way the position coordinate changes with time. The resulting equation traces out a trajectory.

Treatments are a bit tricky to find since there are no standard ways to go about it.

Paul's notes deal with parametric equations (1st link) and an application to line integrals (2nd link).
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParametricEqn.aspx
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/LineIntegralsPtI.aspx

The arc-length parameterization in some detail:
http://www.math.hmc.edu/math142-01/mellon/Differential_Geometry/Geometry_of_curves/Parametric_Curves_and_arc.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K