MHB X^6 - y^6 As Difference of Squares

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on factoring the expression x^6 - y^6 as a difference of squares. The initial factorization is presented as (x^3 - y^3)(x^3 + y^3), leading to the application of the difference of cubes for further simplification. The first factor can be factored using the difference of squares, while the second factor is addressed through a system of equations to find coefficients. Ultimately, the expression is fully factored as (x^2 - y^2)(x^4 + x^2y^2 + y^4) and further simplified to (x^2 + xy + y^2)(x^2 - xy + y^2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing both difference of squares and cubes in the factorization process.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor x^6 - y^6 as a difference of squares.

Solution:

(x^3 - y^3)(x^3 + y^3)

The problems states to use the difference of squares.

I can apply the difference of cubes to the left factor and the sum of cubes to the right factor but how do I continue using the difference of squares?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Once you've done that' you've applied the difference of squares...to continue factoring further, as you noted, you need to use the sum/difference of cubes. Now, if you begin with the difference of cubes, you'd have:

$$x^6-y^6=(x^2-y^2)(x^4+x^2y^2+y^4)$$

Now to continue, you would use the difference of squares on the first factor. To factor the second factor, we can try:

$$x^4+x^2y^2+y^4=(x^2+axy+y^2)(x^2+bxy+y^2)=x^4+(a+b)x^3y+(ab+2)x^2y^2+(a+b)axy^3+y^4$$

Equating coefficients, we obtain the system:

$$a+b=0\implies a=-b$$

$$ab+2=1\implies ab=-1$$

And so we find:

$$(a,b)=(\pm1,\mp1)$$

And we may write:

$$x^4+x^2y^2+y^4=(x^2+xy+y^2)(x^2-xy+y^2)$$

This is what we would find by using the difference of squares first, and then applying the sum/difference of cubes, so that's the simpler route to take. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Once you've done that' you've applied the difference of squares...to continue factoring further, as you noted, you need to use the sum/difference of cubes. Now, if you begin with the difference of cubes, you'd have:

$$x^6-y^6=(x^2-y^2)(x^4+x^2y^2+y^4)$$

Now to continue, you would use the difference of squares on the first factor. To factor the second factor, we can try:

$$x^4+x^2y^2+y^4=(x^2+axy+y^2)(x^2+bxy+y^2)=x^4+(a+b)x^3y+(ab+2)x^2y^2+(a+b)axy^3+y^4$$

Equating coefficients, we obtain the system:

$$a+b=0\implies a=-b$$

$$ab+2=1\implies ab=-1$$

And so we find:

$$(a,b)=(\pm1,\mp1)$$

And we may write:

$$x^4+x^2y^2+y^4=(x^2+xy+y^2)(x^2-xy+y^2)$$

This is what we would find by using the difference of squares first, and then applying the sum/difference of cubes, so that's the simpler route to take. :D

I can use u and v in terms of (x^4+x^2y^2+y^4) just like I did in the other post, right?
 
RTCNTC said:
I can use u and v in terms of (x^4+x^2y^2+y^4) just like I did in the other post, right?

You'd wind up with radicals if you do that. :D
 
Good information.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top