MHB (x) and (x,y) are prime ideals of Q[x,y]

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that the ideals $(x)$ and $(x,y)$ are prime ideals of $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]$ but only the second one is a maximal ideal.

We have to show that $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x)$ and $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x,y)$ are integral domains, right? (Wondering)

How could we show it? Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.
 
Deveno said:
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.

To show that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$ do we use the following mapping? (Wondering)
$$h:\mathbb{Q}[x,y]\rightarrow \mathbb{Q}[y] \\ f(x,y)\mapsto f(0,y)$$

Then does it hold that $h(f_1(x,y)\cdot f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ and $h(f_1(x,y))\cdot h(f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ ? (Wondering)

If this is true, then we have that $h$ is an homomorphism.

So, we have to show that the kernel is $(x)$, right? But how could we do that? (Wondering)
 
It's perhaps easiest to first note that $\Bbb Q[x,y] \cong (\Bbb Q[y])[x]$. I leave you to puzzle out what this isomorphism has to be. We will use this isomorphism to equate the two rings (we can call this "collecting like terms of $x^k$"). For example, if:

$f(x,y) = a_0 + a_1x + a_2y + a_3x^2 + a_4xy + a_5y^2 + a_6x^3 + a_7x^2y + a_8xy^2 + a_9y^3$, then we have:

$f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + f_2(y)x^2 + f_3(y)x^3$, where:

$f_0(y) = a_0 + a_2y + a_5y^2 + a_9y^3$
$f_1(y) = a_1 + a_4y + a_8y^2$
$f_2(y) = a_3 + a_7y$
$f_3(y) = a_6$.

Now for any commutative ring $R$ we have for any extension ring $S$ of $R$, and any $a \in S$, a unique homomorphism:

$\phi_a: R[x] \to S$, given by $\phi_a(f(x)) = f(a)$, the so-called "evaluation at $a$ homomorphism". This is, in fact, one of the *defining properties* of a polynomial ring.

Now take $R = \Bbb Q[y]$, and we see that:

$f(x,y) \mapsto f(0,y)$ is just the evaluation homomorphism $\phi_0$. You can also show this is a homomorphism directly, it's not hard (but tedious).

Now if $g \in (x)$, we have $g(x,y) = xr(x,y)$, for some $r \in \Bbb Q[x,y]$.

So, $\phi_0(g) = \phi_0(xr) = 0r(0,y) = 0$, which shows $(x) \subseteq \text{ker }\phi_0$.

On the other hand, suppose $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = 0$.

Since $f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^n$

we have $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)\cdot 0 + \cdots + f_n(y)\cdot 0^n = f_0(y)$.

Since this is $0 \in \Bbb Q[y]$, we have $f_0(y) = 0$, and thus:

$f(x,y) = x(f_1(y) + f_2(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^{n-1}) \in (x)$, so $\text{ker }\phi_0 \subseteq (x)$.

Now do this process TWICE to get two surjective homomorphisms:

$\Bbb Q[x,y] \to \Bbb Q[y] \to \Bbb Q$, whose composition is thus *also* a surjective homomorphism (let's call it $\pi$).

It is easy to show that $(x,y) \subseteq \text{ker }\pi$. A similar argument as above may help you with the other inclusion.
 
Last edited:
I understand! Thank you very much! (Yes)

I want to show also that the ideal $(2,x,y)$ is a prime ideal of $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]$.

What is $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]/(2,x,y)$ isomorphic to? (Wondering)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top