MHB (x) and (x,y) are prime ideals of Q[x,y]

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that the ideals $(x)$ and $(x,y)$ are prime ideals of $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]$ but only the second one is a maximal ideal.

We have to show that $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x)$ and $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x,y)$ are integral domains, right? (Wondering)

How could we show it? Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.
 
Deveno said:
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.

To show that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$ do we use the following mapping? (Wondering)
$$h:\mathbb{Q}[x,y]\rightarrow \mathbb{Q}[y] \\ f(x,y)\mapsto f(0,y)$$

Then does it hold that $h(f_1(x,y)\cdot f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ and $h(f_1(x,y))\cdot h(f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ ? (Wondering)

If this is true, then we have that $h$ is an homomorphism.

So, we have to show that the kernel is $(x)$, right? But how could we do that? (Wondering)
 
It's perhaps easiest to first note that $\Bbb Q[x,y] \cong (\Bbb Q[y])[x]$. I leave you to puzzle out what this isomorphism has to be. We will use this isomorphism to equate the two rings (we can call this "collecting like terms of $x^k$"). For example, if:

$f(x,y) = a_0 + a_1x + a_2y + a_3x^2 + a_4xy + a_5y^2 + a_6x^3 + a_7x^2y + a_8xy^2 + a_9y^3$, then we have:

$f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + f_2(y)x^2 + f_3(y)x^3$, where:

$f_0(y) = a_0 + a_2y + a_5y^2 + a_9y^3$
$f_1(y) = a_1 + a_4y + a_8y^2$
$f_2(y) = a_3 + a_7y$
$f_3(y) = a_6$.

Now for any commutative ring $R$ we have for any extension ring $S$ of $R$, and any $a \in S$, a unique homomorphism:

$\phi_a: R[x] \to S$, given by $\phi_a(f(x)) = f(a)$, the so-called "evaluation at $a$ homomorphism". This is, in fact, one of the *defining properties* of a polynomial ring.

Now take $R = \Bbb Q[y]$, and we see that:

$f(x,y) \mapsto f(0,y)$ is just the evaluation homomorphism $\phi_0$. You can also show this is a homomorphism directly, it's not hard (but tedious).

Now if $g \in (x)$, we have $g(x,y) = xr(x,y)$, for some $r \in \Bbb Q[x,y]$.

So, $\phi_0(g) = \phi_0(xr) = 0r(0,y) = 0$, which shows $(x) \subseteq \text{ker }\phi_0$.

On the other hand, suppose $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = 0$.

Since $f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^n$

we have $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)\cdot 0 + \cdots + f_n(y)\cdot 0^n = f_0(y)$.

Since this is $0 \in \Bbb Q[y]$, we have $f_0(y) = 0$, and thus:

$f(x,y) = x(f_1(y) + f_2(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^{n-1}) \in (x)$, so $\text{ker }\phi_0 \subseteq (x)$.

Now do this process TWICE to get two surjective homomorphisms:

$\Bbb Q[x,y] \to \Bbb Q[y] \to \Bbb Q$, whose composition is thus *also* a surjective homomorphism (let's call it $\pi$).

It is easy to show that $(x,y) \subseteq \text{ker }\pi$. A similar argument as above may help you with the other inclusion.
 
Last edited:
I understand! Thank you very much! (Yes)

I want to show also that the ideal $(2,x,y)$ is a prime ideal of $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]$.

What is $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]/(2,x,y)$ isomorphic to? (Wondering)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
778
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K