(x) and (x,y) are prime ideals of Q[x,y]

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The ideals $(x)$ and $(x,y)$ in the polynomial ring $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]$ are established as prime ideals, with $(x,y)$ also being a maximal ideal. The proof involves demonstrating that the quotient rings $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x) \cong \mathbb{Q}[y]$ and $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \mathbb{Q}$ are integral domains. This is achieved through surjective ring homomorphisms, specifically using the evaluation homomorphism at zero, which confirms the kernel of the first homomorphism is $(x)$ and the second includes $(x,y)$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime and maximal ideals in ring theory
  • Familiarity with polynomial rings, specifically $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]$
  • Knowledge of ring homomorphisms and their properties
  • Concept of quotient rings and integral domains
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime and maximal ideals in commutative algebra
  • Learn about surjective ring homomorphisms and their applications
  • Explore the structure of polynomial rings over different fields
  • Investigate the isomorphism between quotient rings and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying ring theory, particularly those focusing on ideals and polynomial rings.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that the ideals $(x)$ and $(x,y)$ are prime ideals of $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]$ but only the second one is a maximal ideal.

We have to show that $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x)$ and $\mathbb{Q}[x,y]/(x,y)$ are integral domains, right? (Wondering)

How could we show it? Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.
 
Deveno said:
Modding by a finitely-generated ideal has the effect of essentially setting the generators equal to 0.

See if you can prove that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$, and $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x,y) \cong \Bbb Q$, by finding surjective ring homomorphisms for which these ideals are kernels.

To show that $\Bbb Q[x,y]/(x) \cong \Bbb Q[y]$ do we use the following mapping? (Wondering)
$$h:\mathbb{Q}[x,y]\rightarrow \mathbb{Q}[y] \\ f(x,y)\mapsto f(0,y)$$

Then does it hold that $h(f_1(x,y)\cdot f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ and $h(f_1(x,y))\cdot h(f_2(x,y))=f_1(0,y)\cdot f_2(0,y)$ ? (Wondering)

If this is true, then we have that $h$ is an homomorphism.

So, we have to show that the kernel is $(x)$, right? But how could we do that? (Wondering)
 
It's perhaps easiest to first note that $\Bbb Q[x,y] \cong (\Bbb Q[y])[x]$. I leave you to puzzle out what this isomorphism has to be. We will use this isomorphism to equate the two rings (we can call this "collecting like terms of $x^k$"). For example, if:

$f(x,y) = a_0 + a_1x + a_2y + a_3x^2 + a_4xy + a_5y^2 + a_6x^3 + a_7x^2y + a_8xy^2 + a_9y^3$, then we have:

$f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + f_2(y)x^2 + f_3(y)x^3$, where:

$f_0(y) = a_0 + a_2y + a_5y^2 + a_9y^3$
$f_1(y) = a_1 + a_4y + a_8y^2$
$f_2(y) = a_3 + a_7y$
$f_3(y) = a_6$.

Now for any commutative ring $R$ we have for any extension ring $S$ of $R$, and any $a \in S$, a unique homomorphism:

$\phi_a: R[x] \to S$, given by $\phi_a(f(x)) = f(a)$, the so-called "evaluation at $a$ homomorphism". This is, in fact, one of the *defining properties* of a polynomial ring.

Now take $R = \Bbb Q[y]$, and we see that:

$f(x,y) \mapsto f(0,y)$ is just the evaluation homomorphism $\phi_0$. You can also show this is a homomorphism directly, it's not hard (but tedious).

Now if $g \in (x)$, we have $g(x,y) = xr(x,y)$, for some $r \in \Bbb Q[x,y]$.

So, $\phi_0(g) = \phi_0(xr) = 0r(0,y) = 0$, which shows $(x) \subseteq \text{ker }\phi_0$.

On the other hand, suppose $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = 0$.

Since $f(x,y) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^n$

we have $\phi_0(f(x,y)) = f_0(y) + f_1(y)\cdot 0 + \cdots + f_n(y)\cdot 0^n = f_0(y)$.

Since this is $0 \in \Bbb Q[y]$, we have $f_0(y) = 0$, and thus:

$f(x,y) = x(f_1(y) + f_2(y)x + \cdots + f_n(y)x^{n-1}) \in (x)$, so $\text{ker }\phi_0 \subseteq (x)$.

Now do this process TWICE to get two surjective homomorphisms:

$\Bbb Q[x,y] \to \Bbb Q[y] \to \Bbb Q$, whose composition is thus *also* a surjective homomorphism (let's call it $\pi$).

It is easy to show that $(x,y) \subseteq \text{ker }\pi$. A similar argument as above may help you with the other inclusion.
 
Last edited:
I understand! Thank you very much! (Yes)

I want to show also that the ideal $(2,x,y)$ is a prime ideal of $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]$.

What is $\mathbb{Z}[x,y]/(2,x,y)$ isomorphic to? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K