X-ray's can cause demagnetization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dash-IQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

X-rays and other forms of electromagnetic radiation can demagnetize ferromagnetic materials by altering the orientation of magnetic dipole moments. This phenomenon occurs when energetic photons interact with the magnetic dipoles, potentially knocking them into random orientations, leading to a loss of magnetization. The effectiveness of this method varies depending on the specific magnet and the conditions under which the electromagnetic field is applied. Current research is ongoing to better understand the implications and efficiency of using electromagnetic fields for demagnetization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic fields and their properties
  • Knowledge of ferromagnetism and magnetic dipole moments
  • Familiarity with the interaction of photons with matter
  • Basic principles of magnetization and demagnetization processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of photon interaction with magnetic materials
  • Explore the role of electromagnetic fields in demagnetization techniques
  • Study the properties of ferromagnetic materials and their stable configurations
  • Investigate current research papers on X-ray demagnetization methods
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and engineers interested in the applications of electromagnetic fields in magnetism and demagnetization processes.

Dash-IQ
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
I found this my mistake, it's amazing how for a very short period of time, Xray(and other lasers) can demagnetize a ferromagnets. This is still under research, but how can this be? Can anyone share what they know about this?
Do you all think this is an effective method?
Could it be more efficient than all the others?

Sources:
1, 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...how can this be?
You know that a strong EM field can be used to demagnetize something right?
You know that light is electromagnetism right?

Do you all think this is an effective method?
Define "effective"? It works doesn't it?

Could it be more efficient than all the others?
... that would depend on the magnet and how the phenomenon were being used.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
You know that a strong EM field can be used to demagnetize something right?
You know that light is electromagnetism right?

Define "effective"? It works doesn't it?

... that would depend on the magnet and how the phenomenon were being used.

Yes I knew light was a product of both magnetic&electric field, but never knew it could do that... thanks.
 
Last edited:
It's a matter of making the connection - the details will be in the paper.

The way to think of it is: electric and magnetic fields are each manifestations of an overall electromagnetic field - what you see depends on how you look at it.
 
I could not picture it...
What does a photon do to a moment exactly? Increases the energy thus causing demagnetization or...?
This is pretty new and weird for me to understand.
 
A magnetic dipole in an uneven magnetic field experiences a torque - so it's orientation can change.
This is one way you make ferromagnets. Do you know how things become magnetized to start with?

Thus the incoming light, if energetic enough, can knock a magnetic dipole moment into a new orientation.
If the new orientation is random, then a previously magnetized material will lose it's magnetization.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Do you know how things become magnetized to start with?
Yes.

Simon Bridge said:
Thus the incoming light, if energetic enough, can knock a magnetic dipole moment into a new orientation.
If the new orientation is random, then a previously magnetized material will lose it's magnetization.

I see the connection here, a photon would excite the dipole moment, since it was previously aligned it has a low energy state.
 
I don't know about "excite" - there would be several stable configurations for the magnetic dipoles in a ferro-magnet.
 
Simon Bridge said:
I don't know about "excite" - there would be several stable configurations for the magnetic dipoles in a ferro-magnet.

Giving it more energy - is this the right term? :-p
What seven stable configurations?
 
  • #10
What seven stable configurations?
I don't know about "excite" - there would be several stable configurations for the magnetic dipoles in a ferro-magnet.
... I didn't count them.
There would be a stable configuration in which the ferromaterial was not magnetized for instance.
 
  • #11
There are seveneral of them, perhaps?
 
  • #12
Simon Bridge said:
... I didn't count them.
There would be a stable configuration in which the ferromaterial was not magnetized for instance.

I'm sorry but your giving me puzzles here and I have no idea what you mean...
 
  • #13
Dash-IQ said:
I'm sorry but your giving me puzzles here and I have no idea what you mean...

Not everything made out of, say, iron, is a magnet.
But it may become magnetized.
Being magnetized is a stable state of the material.
Being non-magnetized is another stable state.
There are many combinations of magnetic moments that could lead to either state.
The details depend on the material.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
66
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K