Xenon 124 -- How did they calculate the half life? (trillions of years)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the half-life of xenon-124, which has been reported to be longer than the age of the universe. Participants explore how such a long half-life can be estimated, particularly in light of only one observed decay event.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the method used to calculate the half-life of xenon-124 given that only one decay has been observed.
  • Others explain that half-life is a statistical measure and can be estimated by observing a sufficient number of particles over time, even if the observation time is much shorter than the half-life.
  • A participant raises a hypothetical scenario involving different quantities of atoms and their decay rates to illustrate the concept of half-life.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the availability of xenon-124 isotopes, especially since they are created synthetically, with some participants noting the use of natural xenon and its isotopic abundance.
  • One participant references a specific article that suggests the calculation is based on more than one decay event and provides details about the number of observed events and the isotopic abundance used in the study.
  • Another participant mentions the existence of other isotopes with long half-lives and questions whether there are alternative methods for estimating half-lives, including theoretical calculations.
  • Some participants note that isotopes with extremely long lifetimes typically have a natural abundance that allows for their measurement in laboratory settings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the calculation methods for the half-life of xenon-124, with some agreeing on the statistical nature of half-lives while others question the feasibility of obtaining sufficient isotopes. Multiple competing views remain regarding the methods and implications of the findings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the natural abundance of isotopes and the challenges in observing decays of isotopes with extremely long half-lives. There are unresolved mathematical steps in the estimation process discussed by participants.

idea2000
Messages
99
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
How to calculate half life
How did they calculate the half life of xenon 124 to be longer than the age of the universe if they only observed one decay? Is there some way to estimate half life?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You measure it. Half-life is a statistical quantity and tells you the time it would take for half the particles to decay. If you collect enough particles you can measure very long half-lives. If you observe N particles during a time t, then you would expect to see ##N(1-1/2^{t/T})## decays if the half-life is T. If t is much smaller than T, this is approximately given by ##Nt\ln(2)/T##. Thus, even if the observation time t is much less than the half-life, you will see decays if you collect enough particles, ie, you take a large enough N.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: krater
Yes, however, the half life of xenon 124 is 1 trillion times the current age of our universe and was just reported to be observed yesterday for the very first time, ever. How did they calculate the half life based on one observation?
 
If you have a box of 100 atoms and 50 of them decay in a year, what is the half-life?
If you have a box of 100 atoms and 5 of them decay in a year, what is the half-life?
If you have a box of 1000000 atoms and 5 of them decay in a year, what is the half-life?
If you have a box of 1023 atoms and 5 of them decay in a year, what is the half-life?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman
I understand this principle. What makes me wonder is, that they get enough isotopes, especially if they are created synthetically.
 
fresh_42 said:
I understand this principle. What makes me wonder is, that they get enough isotopes, especially if they are created synthetically.
They use natural xenon, 2 tonnes of it, with an abundance of 1 kg 124Xe per tonne.
 
idea2000 said:
if they only observed one decay

In addition to what was already said, where does this come from? According to the article (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1124-4), this is not just based on one event.

fresh_42 said:
that they get enough isotopes, especially if they are created synthetically.

If I understand correctly, it is just the natural abundance in the detector. You only get ~ 0.1% Xenon 124, but then you take a ton of Xenon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and DrClaude
fresh_42 said:
get enough isotopes
There is only one isotope of relevance, 124-Xe. The issue is getting enough nuclei of that isotope.

idea2000 said:
Yes, however, the half life of xenon 124 is 1 trillion times the current age of our universe and was just reported to be observed yesterday for the very first time, ever. How did they calculate the half life based on one observation?
For the future, you should remember to include a reference to the original paper when you have a particular issue that you want to discuss. In this case, the appropriate reference would have been the Nature paper.

The paper quotes a measured number of events of ##N_0 = 126\pm 29## over 177.7 days of data taking. They have an isotopic abundance of about ##10^{-3}## and the efficiency is almost one. This means that they have
$$
N = 10^{-3} \frac{M N_A}{m}
$$
124-Xe atoms, where ##M## is the total xenon mass, ##N_A## the Avogadro number, and ##m## the molar mass of xenon (ca 131 g/mol), leading to ##N \simeq 5\cdot 10^{24}##. The estimate of the half-life is therefore (solving from the expression in #2)
$$
T \simeq \frac{N t \ln 2}{N_0} \simeq 10^{12} T_{\rm univ},
$$
where ##T_{\rm univ}## is the age of the Universe.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: diogenesNY, mfb and DrClaude
Orodruin said:
There is only one isotope of relevance, 124-Xe. The issue is getting enough nuclei of that isotope.
I had encountered another element recently with an equally absurd half time and it wasn't natural, or extremely rare. Unfortunately I have forgotten which one. I only remember that I asked myself the same question, and a high number of isotopes didn't seem to provide a solution. The only other possibility was an extremely long observation time, but it made me wonder, whether there are other methods, maybe theoretical calculations.
 
  • #10
There are just a few isotopes with measured extremely long lifetimes. 130Te with 8*1020 years and 128Te with 2*1024 years are notable examples, both make up ~1/3 of natural tellurium each, however (list of isotopes). The first lifetime is measurable in the lab, the second one is measured based on decay ratios of the two isotopes in very old rocks.

Every isotope with a measured lifetime larger than 1018 years has a natural abundance of at least 0.1%. List by half life

There are theoretical calculations for a lot of unmeasured lifetimes, of course, and theoretical calculations are not limited to naturally occurring isotopes. Long-living isotopes typically exist in nature, however. They might live too long for us to detect the decay but we won't suddenly find an isotope that lives so long but doesn't occur in nature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K