Yes, that is correct. The sequence is convergent for n>1, but not for n=1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence and monotonicity of the sequence defined by the expression \(\frac{2n-3}{3n-5}\). Participants are exploring whether the sequence is monotonic and convergent, particularly examining its behavior for different values of \(n\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the differences \(a_n - a_{n+1}\) to determine monotonicity and questioning whether this expression is positive for all \(n\). There is an exploration of rewriting the sequence to facilitate analysis of its convergence.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing guidance on how to approach the proof of convergence, while others are questioning the assumptions made regarding monotonicity for specific values of \(n\). There is an acknowledgment that the sequence may converge monotonically after a certain point, particularly for \(n > 1.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the behavior of the sequence at \(n=1\) differs from that at \(n>1\), which raises questions about the overall monotonicity and convergence of the sequence across its domain.

Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I got one progression [tex]\frac{2n-3}{3n-5}[/tex].

Is this monotonic and convergent?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I tried an-an+1=1/(3n-5)(3n-2)>0

But for n=1 and n=2, we got 1/2 and 1, so I think that this string is not monotonic, right?

I think it is convergent because it got a=2/3.

[tex]|a_n-a|<\epsilon[/tex]

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure

[tex] a_n - a_{n+1} = \frac 1 {(3n-5)(3n-2)}[/tex]


is [tex]> 0[/tex] for every [tex]n = 1, 2, 3, \dots[/tex]? :smile: Compare the result you
get from the formula above to the actual value of [tex]a_1 - a_2[/tex].
You are on the correct track for proving convergence.
 
Physicsissuef said:

Homework Statement



I got one progression [tex]\frac{2n-3}{3n-5}[/tex].

Is this monotonic and convergent?

But for n=1 and n=2, we got 1/2 and 1, so I think that this string is not monotonic, right?

I think it is convergent because it got a=2/3.

Hi Physicsissuef! :smile:

It would be much easier if you you rewrote it in the form 2/3 + A/(3n - 5). :wink:

If it's monotonic except for the first one or two, then you should say so.

It converges monotonically after a certain point. :smile:
 
statdad said:
Are you sure

[tex] a_n - a_{n+1} = \frac 1 {(3n-5)(3n-2)}[/tex] is [tex]> 0[/tex] for every [tex]n = 1, 2, 3, \dots[/tex]? :smile: Compare the result you
get from the formula above to the actual value of [tex]a_1 - a_2[/tex].
You are on the correct track for proving convergence.

Yes, I am sure that it is correct, but as you can see for n=1 (i.e a1,a2), it is

1/(3-5)(3-2)
-1/2 < 0

and for n>1, it is monotonic.

tiny-tim said:
Hi Physicsissuef! :smile:

It would be much easier if you you rewrote it in the form 2/3 + A/(3n - 5). :wink:

If it's monotonic except for the first one or two, then you should say so.

It converges monotonically after a certain point. :smile:

So if I write
[tex]|a_n-a|=|\frac{2n-3}{3n-5}-\frac{2}{3}|=|\frac{3(2n-3)-2(3n-5)}{3(3n-5)}|=<br /> |\frac{6n-9-6n+10}{3(3n-5}|=\frac{1}{3(3n-5)} < \epsilon[/tex]

So it is convergent, probably for n>1, because if n=1, [tex]1/3(3-5)=-1/6 < \epsilon[/tex]

Because of the fact that [tex]\epsilon[/tex] can't be negative i.e [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex], it is convergent for n>1, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K