Yes, this is correct. At time t = 4, the two particles' directions are parallel.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the time at which two particles, represented by their directional vectors, are parallel. The vectors are given as (t-6,-t,6) and (1,2,1-t), and participants explore the conditions under which these vectors are scalar multiples of each other.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the relationship between the two vectors by setting them equal to a scalar multiple of each other, leading to a system of equations. Some participants suggest checking the derived value of t by substituting it back into the vectors to verify parallelism.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in verifying the calculations and checking the correctness of the derived value of t. There is an acknowledgment of the work done, and some participants express confidence in the findings without reaching a formal consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the derived equations accurately reflect the conditions for parallel vectors, with participants questioning the assumptions made during the calculations.

vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Two particles move through space in a way that at time t, they are traveling in directions

(t-6,-t,6) And (1,2,1-t)
at what time are their directions parallel?

-

I know that for them to be parallel, a = Kb, where a and b are the two vectors, and one vector is a scalar of the other

I get something along the lines of

(t-6,-t,6) = K(1,2,1-t)
giving me equations
t-6 = k
-t = 2k
6 = k(1-t)

please someone check

I had -t = 2k
(-t/2) = k

subbing into t-6

t-6 = (-t/2)
2(t-6) = -t
2t - 12 = -t
3t = 12
12/3 = t
t=4

is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is easy to check. Substitute t = 4 into your two vectors. If this value of t is correct, one vector will be a scalar multiple of the other (and vice versa, but the scalar multiple in this case will be the reciprocal of the other).
 
Mark44 said:
This is easy to check. Substitute t = 4 into your two vectors. If this value of t is correct, one vector will be a scalar multiple of the other (and vice versa, but the scalar multiple in this case will be the reciprocal of the other).

so it's right?
 
What does your check show?
 
(-2,-4,6)=k(1,2,-3)

-2=k*1, k = -2
-4=k*2 k = -4/2 = -2
6=k*(-3) k = 6/(-3) = -2

so yeah

awesome sauce
cheers bigears
 
Good work! And you did it all yourself!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K