Yet another question about the double slits

  • Thread starter Thread starter intervoxel
  • Start date Start date
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
Apparatus: Electron source + double slit + screen + lamp.

If the lamp is left turned on but the physicist leaves the room for an hour, does he see an interference pattern when he returns?

(Sorry if this simple question has been done before)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The result of the experiment has nothing to do with whether the physicist is in the room or not.
 
I see. So the photons simply destroy the superposition state, which is equivalent to an observation, collapsing the wavefunction.

Thanks
 
Is this double-slit experiment done with photons or electrons?
 
So after reading about quantum theory awhile ago, I inevitably came across the infamous double slit experiment, and I understand the concept, how the act of "observation" collapses the wave function of that which is fired through the slits, but what I did not understand fully, is what constitutes an "observer" or "observation" exactly? I know measuring where an electron is while going through the slits collapses the wave function, but what else would?
 
diazona said:
Is this double-slit experiment done with photons or electrons?

Electrons.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top