You hate Obama's health care penalty for the uninsured?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Health
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of the Affordable Care Act's health insurance mandate, which imposes fines of up to $1500 per year for uninsured individuals. Participants argue that there exists an implicit contract between citizens and the government, necessitating emergency medical treatment regardless of insurance status. The conversation highlights the financial burden on hospitals due to uninsured patients and advocates for universal coverage to stabilize healthcare costs. Additionally, suggestions for reform include standardizing billing practices and implementing tort reform to reduce overall healthcare expenses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
  • Familiarity with emergency medical services and their funding
  • Knowledge of healthcare billing practices
  • Awareness of tort reform and its implications on healthcare costs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Affordable Care Act on emergency services
  • Explore healthcare billing standardization practices
  • Investigate tort reform measures and their impact on healthcare costs
  • Learn about health savings accounts and their role in individual healthcare financing
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for healthcare policy analysts, insurance professionals, and individuals interested in understanding the complexities of the U.S. healthcare system and the financial responsibilities associated with emergency medical services.

  • #151
zomgwtf said:
Or are you just against paying taxes altogether and everyone should keep every penny of what they've earned? Maybe you live in the wrong country?
Uhh, which country would be the right one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
Alfi said:
$250,000

Holy crap !

I make 10% of that as a Electronics Technician fixing computer motherboards.
I guess I move in the wrong crowd.
Sure glad I'm Canadian and have nothing to do with this debate.


It's been a very good read. Thanks to all who contributed to it thus far.

Yes, it's amazing how national pride in comparing one's blessed welfare state with the "big bad capitalist US" works to motivate the world's masses to accept relatively low salaries without realizing that the money they're not getting is going into the pockets of those who underpay them.
 
  • #153
relatively low salaries without realizing that the money they're not getting is going into the pockets of those who underpay them.
uh ..ya ...That would be an American company outsourcing jobs.

But at least I'm in good health :)
 
  • #154
Alfi said:
uh ..ya ...That would be an American company outsourcing jobs.

But at least I'm in good health :)

Look, I'm not the least bit nationalistic, but it seriously irritates me when people are and they're not even critical enough to see how it can be used against them.

Investors living in socialized post-industrial economies invest money in economies that are favorable for them to make lots of money so they can afford the high taxes and cost of living in the socialized post-industrial cities where they live.

Otherwise put, investors globally put their money in US-based companies to take advantage of low corporate taxes. You can call such companies "an American company" but there's a good chance there are global interests behind them with the goal of making profit to fund a well-isolated socialized post-industrial economy (WISPIE) somewhere else. In case you don't like the term, WISPIE (which I made up), you could just call such economies NSIs (national-socialist islands).

Anyway, the point is that one of the ways that these investors can channel money into their WISPIE NSI of choice is to out-source choice jobs to people living there. That reduces unemployment and reduces the cost of socialized benefits of those governments.

Then, you can pay people very little and tell them it's because a "mean American company" is their employer, plus they should be happy that they live in a nice socialized non-US country where everyone loves each other and would never exploit each other cruelly as happens in that "big bad capitalism over there."

In reality, the "American company" that "out-sources" jobs to you is probably a company funded and dedicated to the interest of serving you and others in the socialized paradise you live in. Then you all talk about how bad the US and capitalism are to relieve your guilt of being some of the most privileged people in all of capitalism.

Finally get it people. The global economy is totally interconnected. Everyone is part of the US economy and the US economy is part of every other economy. You're not separate. You can't be separate. The only reason you want to be separate is because it fuels your thirst for ethno-national differentiation and superiority. That way you can basically live in segregation among only the people who meet your standards, and everyone else has to go live in a poor or otherwise inferior region because they're not allowed to migrate to a post-industrial socialized paradise.
 

Similar threads

Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 895 ·
30
Replies
895
Views
99K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K