Young's Modulus; Extension of a wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the depression of a horizontal wire and the tension when a mass is hung from its midpoint. The correct solution indicates that the depression y equals l0 / 20 and the tension T equals 5 * mg, derived from the relationships between strain, tension, and force equilibrium. Key equations utilized include the Strain-Displacement Equation, Force Equilibrium Equation, and Stress Strain Equation, which collectively lead to the solution of the problem presented in A.P. French's "Vibrations and Waves".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's Modulus and its application in tensile stress
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem in the context of geometry
  • Knowledge of Hooke's Law and its relation to material deformation
  • Ability to solve force equilibrium problems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Young's Modulus and its practical applications in material science
  • Learn about the binomial expansion and its use in approximating small displacements
  • Explore the relationship between tension and strain in different loading conditions
  • Investigate advanced topics in solid mechanics, particularly in deformational analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics and material properties, as well as educators and professionals involved in structural engineering and materials science.

AJKing
Messages
104
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



This is from A.P. French, Vibrations and Waves, Problem 3-7

A wire of unstretched length l0 is extended by a distance of 10-3l0 when a certain mass is hung from its bottom end. If this same wire is [turned to be horizontal] and the same mass is hung from the midpoint of the wire [...], what is the depression y of the midpoint, and what is the tension in the wire?

Homework Equations



F = -\frac{AY}{l_0}*x

F = k*x

k = -\frac{AY}{l_0}

The Attempt at a Solution



The correct answer is y = l0 / 20
and T = 5 * mg

I have not recreated these solutions.

I have two triangles to consider:

one of lengths, with base l0/2, height y and hypotenuse l0 + x

one of Forces, with base Ti, height mg/2 and hypotenuse T = -\frac{AY}{l_0}*x

I've tried a lot of things. I'm missing something fundamental.
If you can get the correct answer, I would appreciate a little direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wire extension

Does this make sense?
At this stage my answer seem to be out by a factor 2.
 

Attachments

  • extension of a wire.jpg
    extension of a wire.jpg
    11.2 KB · Views: 1,031
Last edited:
For forces,

how did you get kl0/2000 for the horizontal aspect?
 
From the conditions on the vertical orientation of the wire, you get that

YA = 1000 mg

Let y represent the distance that the center of the wire moves down. Then, from the pythagorean theorem,
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) ^2=\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2
Solving for l/2:
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) =\sqrt{\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2}≈\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right)+\frac{y^2}{l_0}
From this, strain=\frac{l/2-l_0/2}{l_0/2}=2\left(\frac{y}{l_0}\right)^2

Let T represent the tension in the wire. Force balance on hanging weight:
2T\frac{y}{l_0/2}=mg

How is the tension related to Y, A, and the strain in the wire?
 
1/2 mg = k lo /1000
 
Basic_Physics said:
1/2 mg = k lo /1000
This is incorrect. We already showed before that YA=kl0=1000 mg, based on the weight being in equilibrium when the weight is hung from the wire vertically. The question I was asking was, what is the general relation between the tension and strain, to wit:

T = YA (strain) = kl0 (strain)

In the case of the horizontal wire, this gives

T = YA (2 (y/l0)^2)=1000mg (2 (y/l0)^2)

See what you get when you substitute this into the force balance.
 
Typo, I wanted to say

1/2 mg = k lo /2000

This I concluded from the information given in the initial problem statement.
The 1/2 factor comes from the fact that only half of the magnitude of the weight is used for the base of the inverted right angled triangle in the force diagram. Do you agree with that?
 
Basic_Physics said:
Typo, I wanted to say

1/2 mg = k lo /2000

This I concluded from the information given in the initial problem statement.
The 1/2 factor comes from the fact that only half of the magnitude of the weight is used for the base of the inverted right angled triangle in the force diagram. Do you agree with that?

No. If this is the force balance for the weight hanging from the horizontal wire, then it is incorrect. From the free body diagram, if T is the tension in the wire, you have to determine the component of T in the vertical direction (see the force balance equation that I gave in my earlier post). Also, the strain and tension in the horizontal wire are not the same as in the vertical wire.

Chet
 
I used a vector diagram for the forces turned through 90o
where W is the weight and T the tensions in the wire.
One can then use the fact that the two triangles are congruent to compare the ratio of the sides.
 

Attachments

  • extension of a wire - forces.jpg
    extension of a wire - forces.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 743
Last edited:
  • #10
This diagram is not what is described in the problem statement (for which the book solution and my solution apply). Think of a long horizontal clothesline from which you hang a small weight at the center.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
From the conditions on the vertical orientation of the wire, you get that

YA = 1000 mg

Let y represent the distance that the center of the wire moves down. Then, from the pythagorean theorem,
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) ^2=\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2
Solving for l/2:
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) =\sqrt{\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2}≈\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right)+\frac{y^2}{l_0}
From this, strain=\frac{l/2-l_0/2}{l_0/2}=2\left(\frac{y}{l_0}\right)^2

Let T represent the tension in the wire. Force balance on hanging weight:
2T\frac{y}{l_0/2}=mg

How is the tension related to Y, A, and the strain in the wire?

Taylor expansions need to be more popular in my repertoire.
And using sinx = tanx was also wise.
These were stumbling points - certainly.

Using your approximations, I can easily calculate the Tension if I assume y = l0/20
However, I'm still having problems calculating y.

May I have a less thorough suggestion?
 
  • #12
AJKing said:
Taylor expansions need to be more popular in my repertoire.
And using sinx = tanx was also wise.
These were stumbling points - certainly.

Using your approximations, I can easily calculate the Tension if I assume y = l0/20
However, I'm still having problems calculating y.

May I have a less thorough suggestion?

You are basically dealing with 3 key types of equations in this analysis:

1. The Strain-Displacement Equation
2. The Force Equilibrium Equation
3. The Stress Strain Equation

In the end, you will combine these three equations to get the solution to your problem.

Strain-Displacement Equation:
The Strain-Displacement Equation is a geometric equation which, in this problem, expresses the tensile strain ε in the wire as a function of the downward displacement at the center of the wire y. We already derived this relationship, and it is given by:
\epsilon=2\left(\frac{y}{l_0}\right)^2
Force-Equilibrium Equation:
This is the force balance on the weight, and expresses the tension in the wire T as a function of the displacement y. We already derived this relationship, and it is given by:
2T\left(\frac{y}{l_0/2}\right)=mg
Stress Strain Equation:
This is basically Hooke's law, and expresses the tension in the wire as a function of the tensile strain in the wire:
T=YA\epsilon
But, in Part I of the problem, we showed that, YA=1000mg
Therefore, for this problem, the Hooke's law relationship becomes:
T=1000mg\epsilon

Now, all you need to do is combine these three equations:
\epsilon=2\left(\frac{y}{l_0}\right)^2
2T\left(\frac{y}{l_0/2}\right)=mg
T=1000mg\epsilon

You do this by eliminating the tension T and the strain ε from the equations. See what you get when you do this.
 
  • #13
Chestermiller said:
[...]

Damn.

I appreciate all the help. I've arrived at the right answer.
But, damn.

I did not do well on this question.

Thanks mate
 
  • #14
Hey AJ. Don't feel bad. I've had lots of practical experience with solid deformational mechanics. In my judgement, this was not an Introductory Physics problem. Just hang in there.

Chet
 
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
From the conditions on the vertical orientation of the wire, you get that

YA = 1000 mg

Let y represent the distance that the center of the wire moves down. Then, from the pythagorean theorem,
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) ^2=\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2
Solving for l/2:
\left( \frac{l}{2}\right) =\sqrt{\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2}≈\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right)+\frac{y^2}{l_0}
From this, strain=\frac{l/2-l_0/2}{l_0/2}=2\left(\frac{y}{l_0}\right)^2

Let T represent the tension in the wire. Force balance on hanging weight:
2T\frac{y}{l_0/2}=mg

How is the tension related to Y, A, and the strain in the wire?

Thank you so much for this explanation. Something that comes to mind:
How did you know to make this approximation?
\sqrt{\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2}≈\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right)+\frac{y^2}{l_0}
 
  • #16
mbigras said:
Thank you so much for this explanation. Something that comes to mind:
How did you know to make this approximation?
\sqrt{\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right) ^2+y^2}≈\left( \frac{l_0}{2}\right)+\frac{y^2}{l_0}

Hi MBIGRAS. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Answer to your question: From experience with clotheslines, I just knew that y was going to be small compared to l0/2. So, I just used the binomial expansion (a+b)n with n = 1/2 and a = (l0/2)2.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K