Which Material is Safer for a Swing Safety Pad?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the selection of materials for a swing safety pad, specifically comparing two materials with differing Young's Modulus values. Material 1 has a Young's Modulus twice that of Material 2. The consensus leans towards Material 2, as it absorbs kinetic energy more effectively due to its lower Young's Modulus, resulting in a longer duration of impact force application and consequently a lower average impact force. The relationship between impulse, force, and time is emphasized, highlighting that a longer collision duration reduces the force experienced during impact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's Modulus and its implications in material science.
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics concepts, particularly impulse and momentum.
  • Knowledge of force application and its relationship with time during collisions.
  • Basic grasp of kinetic energy absorption in materials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of materials with varying Young's Modulus values.
  • Explore the principles of impulse and momentum in collision scenarios.
  • Investigate the impact absorption characteristics of different materials used in safety applications.
  • Learn about the practical applications of material selection in safety equipment design.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, material scientists, safety equipment designers, and anyone involved in the development of child safety products will benefit from this discussion.

Bogus_Roads
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two different materials are being considered for a safety pad below a swing. Material 1 has a Young's Modulus twice that of Material 2. Which should be chosen?

A. Material 2, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
B. Material 1, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
C. Material 2, because a material with a lower Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.
D. Material 1, because a material with a higher Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.

Homework Equations



(\DeltaL/Lo)*E=F/A.

The Attempt at a Solution


\DeltaL is clearly larger with a smaller YM, but does the mean the length over which the impact force acts is larger. Does that then mean that it's lower impact? I've never even come across the idea of absorption of kinetic energy, and I don't think it's obvious that something that is "squishy" should absorb kinetic energy more quickly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of force in a collision as the change in momentum divided by the amount of time it takes.

Therefore, the longer a collision takes, the less force is applied.
 
How do you know greater length acted over=greater time?
 
It's based upon impulse. It's defined better here than I could do myself, so I'll just quote...

In classical mechanics, an impulse is defined as the integral of a force with respect to time. When a force is applied to a rigid body it changes the momentum of that body. A small force applied for a long time can produce the same momentum change as a large force applied briefly, because it is the product of the force and the time for which it is applied that is important. The impulse is equal to the change of momentum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K