Your favorite definition of physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on defining physics and its distinction from other sciences, particularly chemistry and biology. Participants emphasize that physics is a branch of science focused on the study of matter, energy, and their interactions, while science encompasses a broader system of knowledge derived from the scientific method. Notable quotes from Richard Feynman and Mario Bunge highlight the debate on whether chemistry is a subset of physics, with some arguing that chemistry's laws are derived from quantum physics. The conversation reflects a deep exploration of the philosophical and practical implications of these definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific terminology, including "matter," "energy," and "scientific method."
  • Familiarity with the contributions of physicists such as Richard Feynman and Mario Bunge.
  • Knowledge of the distinctions between various branches of science, particularly physics, chemistry, and biology.
  • Awareness of fundamental concepts in quantum physics and classical mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Richard Feynman's views on the relationship between physics and mathematics.
  • Explore Mario Bunge's work on the classification of sciences, particularly his views on chemistry and physics.
  • Study the principles of quantum physics and how they relate to classical chemistry.
  • Investigate the definitions and applications of various branches of physics, including condensed matter physics and materials science.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in the fields of physics, chemistry, and science education who seek a deeper understanding of the definitions and relationships between these disciplines.

  • #31
The first step of applied mathematics. Engineering is the second step. By comparison, most of the other sciences use relatively little math.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
humanino said:
Prigogine I know his work rather well, and I do not think we are talking about the same issues, at all.

Are you talking about Byung Chan Eu ? Can you please point out to a technical reference describing the equation you are referring to and how the equation was suggested ? I believe this work amounts to using a large computer simulation and fit it with a simple function. I hope I have the wrong reference.

You say yourself that reductionism is dead because of findings in the late XXth century. But Poincare stumbled onto chaos long before that, in fact at the end of the XIXth century, and it just took a long time for non-mathematician to realize what chaos and non-linear dynamics mean. A good reference would be "Structural Stability and Morphogenesis" for instance, much earlier than what you quote. Of course you will not get non-linear behavior out of a simple Shrodinger equation. Anyway, I will wait until a proper reference has been provided.

Prigogine knows that the laws of chemical reactions are not derivable from quantum electrodynamics in despite of your beliefs. What is more, Prigogine starts one of his last papers Chemical kinetics and dynamics with a critique of the well-known Dirac quote about the reduction of chemistry to quantum mechanics.

About Eu, a good reference is his monograph Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics: Ensemble Method. He suggested his equation after checking that the related Schrödinger-based theories could not explain all the transport phenomena of his interest. As a consequence he postulated his equation. As he correctly notes, the Schrödinger equation can be obtained as a special case from his equation, but the inverse is not true.

Nowhere I said that reductionism was dead because of work on chaos. At contrary I wrote about other three different topics.

I think that I already said that this thread is about definitions of physics, and I think that I do not need to write more about reductionism.
 
  • #33
DoggerDan said:
The first step of applied mathematics. Engineering is the second step. By comparison, most of the other sciences use relatively little math.

What is for you the difference between physics and mathematical physics?
 
  • #34
Enough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
6K