Z²+bz+1=0, where |b|≤2. For which values of b do the following hold?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Safee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quadratic equation \( z^2 + bz + 1 = 0 \) with the constraint \( |b| \leq 2 \). Participants explore the conditions under which the roots \( z \) are real and negative, as well as the implications of Euler's identity in determining the values of \( b \) for which specific properties hold. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding complex numbers and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that for the first condition (i), \( 0 < b \leq 2 \) is necessary for \( z \) to be negative.
  • Others argue that \( z \) must be real, leading to the conclusion that \( b \) can only be \( \pm 2 \) for the second condition (ii).
  • A participant questions the assumption that \( z \) being negative implies \( b \) must be positive, suggesting that the real part of \( z \) should be considered instead.
  • Another participant clarifies that the imaginary part of \( z \) does not affect the condition \( |e^z| < 1 \), as it only depends on the real part.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of the modulus of complex numbers and how it relates to the conditions for \( b \).
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the treatment of the imaginary part and its implications for the inequality involving \( |e^z| \).
  • A later reply indicates a realization about the modulus of complex numbers and how it simplifies the analysis of the conditions for \( b \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express differing views on the implications of the conditions for \( b \), with some asserting specific ranges while others refine their understanding based on the properties of complex numbers. The discussion remains unresolved with respect to the exact conditions for \( b \) as participants explore various interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of distinguishing between real and complex roots, and the necessity of ensuring that the roots satisfy the conditions imposed by the modulus of complex numbers. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of \( z \) and the implications for \( b \) based on the conditions discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in complex analysis, quadratic equations, and the properties of roots in relation to parameters in mathematical expressions.

Stephen Safee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6602
Hello,

This is to check whether my answer is correct or not.
I got for (i) $ $ $0<b\le2$, $ $ and for (ii) $ $ $\pm \frac{1+\pi^2}{\pi}$.

I’m not convinced about the method I used.

I started by finding the two possible roots expressed in terms of $b$, by completing the square.
Now, if (i) is to be true then $z$ must be negative. So, I checked the possible values for $b$ so that $z$ is negative.

For (ii), I used Euler's Identity, and observed that $z=\pmπ$ if (ii) is true. I solved $\pm \pi=-\frac{b}{2}\pm\sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}$ $ $ to get a value for $b$.

Is this correct? If not, why is this method not giving the correct answer?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • BowIy.png
    BowIy.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 144
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephen Safee said:
Hello,

This is to check whether my answer is correct or not.
I got for (i) $ $ $0<b\le2$, $ $ and for (ii) $ $ $\pm \frac{1+\pi^2}{\pi}$.

I’m not convinced about the method I used.

I started by finding the two possible roots expressed in terms of $b$, by completing the square.
Now, if (i) is to be true then $z$ must be negative. So, I checked the possible values for $b$ so that $z$ is negative.
z must be negative if z is real. Are you assuming that?

For (ii), I used Euler's Identity, and observed that $z=\pmπ$ if (ii) is true.
I suggest you look at Euler's identity again! For $z= \pm\pi$. e^{iz} is 1 and -1. But for z any real number, $|e^{iz}|= 1$.

I solved $\pm \pi=-\frac{b}{2}\pm\sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}$ $ $ to get a value for $b$.

Is this correct? If not, why is this method not giving the correct answer?

Thank you.
 
For (i), I deduced that for $z$ to satisfy the equation, it must be real (which doesn't prevent it from also being complex). This is because a non-real complex number cannot be negative. Is this reasoning sound?

EDIT
Following from the above, I have to reconsider my answer for (i).
We have $z=-\frac b2 ± \sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}$, which means for $z$ to be real, $ $ $b$ can only be $\pm2$.
But if $b=-2$ then $z>0$, which doesn't satisfy (i). $ $ So, in fact, $b=2$.For (ii), I think I get it now. We have

$z=-\frac b2 ± \sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}$, so

$|e^{i(-\frac b2 ± \sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1})}|=1$

By Euler's formula (as clarified in your post!), we need to find values for $b$ such that $-\frac b2 ± \sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}\in \mathbb{R}$.

$b=\pm 2$ is the correct answer, because then $\sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}=0$ and $-\frac b2=\mp1$.

Any other possible value for $b$ is not an option because then $\sqrt{\frac{b^2}{4}-1}$ becomes imaginary. This means multiplying it by the factor $i$ makes it real, which would leave us with $-i\frac b2+x$ (where $x \in \mathbb{R}$) which is $\neq ix$, and so does not satisfy Euler's formula.

---
If the above is still wrong, then please feel free to put me out of my misery with the answer!
 
Last edited:
Hi Stephen Safee! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Suppose we write $z=x+iy$.

Then for (i):
$$|e^z| = |e^{x+iy}| = |e^{x}|\cdot |e^{iy}| = e^x < 1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad x<0$$
That is:
$$\operatorname{Re}z = -\frac b2 < 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad b>0$$
We don't care about the imaginary part, which is allowed to be anything.
$z$ can be imaginary as long as the real part is negative.
So your initial result for (i) was correct.

For the record, $z<0$ has no meaning, since the complex numbers cannot be ordered. I'm assuming $\operatorname{Re}z < 0$ is intended.Similarly for (ii):
$$|e^{iz}| = |e^{i(x+iy)}| = |e^{-y + ix}| = e^{-y} = 1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad y=0$$
That is:
$$\operatorname{Im}z = \pm \sqrt{1-\frac{b^2}{4}} = 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad b=\pm 2$$
 
Thanks.

There's just one detail that still doesn't make sense to me.

I like Serena said:
We don't care about the imaginary part, which is allowed to be anything.

But why? It seems I'm just not seeing the logic behind this, which is rather a pain...

So, on one hand we have $z=x+iy$, on the other |e^z|<1, hence |e^(x+iy)|<1. So far, so good.

We cannot say $x+iy<0$. It's indeed absurd, because x+iy is not on the real line to begin with, so it can't either precede or follow any number that is on the real line.

That is, if we could look at all the numbers to the left of 0 we won't see the number x+iy appearing anywhere. Similarly, looking to the right of 0 won't change anything. (This is my understanding of this concept. Is it correct?)

Therefore, x+iy is neither negative nor positive.

How then do we make sense of the inequality $|e^{x+iy}|<1$ ? Well (and clearly here's my mistake), the only way I see is for $iy$ to equal 0, and so for $y$ to equal 0. This assumes that $z$ is real, but you say $z$ can also be complex with an imaginary part. What is then happening to the imaginary part when we write $|e^{x+iy}|=|e^x|<1$ ?

You say nothing, because we don't care about it. My problem is I don't understand what this means in the context described above : (
Obviously, we are not pretending the imaginary part is not there. So what are we doing then?

This is really what is preventing me from understanding what seems to be a rather straightforward concept...
 
I've got it!

The issue couldn't have been any sillier.

I had forgotten the very specific meaning of the symbol $|$ $ $ $|$ for complex numbers...
Which of course means modulus of the complex number.

Usually, the modulus, when the complex number is written in the cartesian form $x+iy$, is $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$, so it's simply the distance of the complex number from the origin.

However, when it's written in the exponential form $re^{iy}$, $ $ $r$ is then the modulus.
So, all the question was asking was to rearrange the inequality into the form $|re^{iy}|=r<1$, then deduce the value of $b$ from the value of $r$!

So ultimately, this gives $|e^{x+iy}|=|e^{x}e^{iy}|$, where $r=e^{x}$.
Hence, $|e^{x}e^{iy}|=e^{x}$, by simple definition of the operation $|$ $ $ $|$ for complex numbers.

So, stepping back to the initial inequality, we have $|e^z|=e^x<1$.
Since $x=-b/2$, it follows that to satisfy (i), $b$ can be any number in the interval $(0, 2]$.

PS:
Note to self -- never forget to revise topics you learned months ago before starting to do exercises on them!
 
Last edited:
Stephen Safee said:
I've got it!...

Thank you for conscientiously coming back to your thread and posting your work to finalize the topic. (Yes)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K