Z=f(x,y), x=function, y=function. dz/dx=

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrcleanhands
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 7K views
mrcleanhands

Homework Statement


Consider z=f(x,y), where x=rcosθ and y=rsinθ

Show that [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\cos\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}-\frac{1}{r}\sin\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta}[/itex]



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Z
Connects to X and Y
X Connects to r and θ, Y Connects to r and θ

Is dz/dx not then equal to dx/dr + dx/dθ? because that is equivalent to dz/dx = r -rsinθ.
What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}=\cos\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\sin\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex]

then rearranging this [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\sec\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}-\tan\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex]

I'm not doing something right or not understanding some underlying concept here. Why was my dz/dx derivation wrong?
 
[itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta}=-r\sin\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\frac{1}{r}\cos\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex]

I've re-arranged this and get [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=-\frac{1}{r}\csc\frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\cot\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex]

which should be the same as [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\sec\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}-\tan\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex]

Now I'm more confused...

Isn't it just [itex]r-r\sin\theta[/itex]?
 
Start with the end in mind or you won't get anywhere:
- you want ∂z/∂x in terms of ∂z/∂r and ∂z/dθ.

You don't need any terms in ∂z/∂y ... but the above relations each have such a term.
This should suggest a course of action to you.
 
Hey Simon, I got it!

I isolated [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}[/itex] for both equations of [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta}[/itex] and then equated the two and re-arranged a little to get [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\cos\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial r}-\frac{1}{r}\sin\theta\frac{\partial z}{\partial\theta}[/itex].However, I still don't get why the solution is simply not [itex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial x}{\partial r}+ \frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}=\cos\theta - r\sin\theta[/itex]
 
mrcleanhands said:
Hey Simon, I got it!
Well done.

However, I still don't get why the solution is simply not [tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial x}{\partial r}+ \frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}=\cos\theta - r\sin\theta[/tex]
... but didn't you just demonstrate that it isn't?
Looks like you may need to go back to what the partial means.