Z-score/percentile rank question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ACHQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    rank
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary percentile rank on a supplemental application to achieve a desired overall percentile for college admissions, given a specific grade point average (GPA) percentile. The conversation includes mathematical reasoning and assumptions regarding the normalization of scores using z-scores and their weighted averages.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for calculating the final percentile based on the weighted average of GPA and supplemental application percentiles, leading to the conclusion that a 55 percentile GPA cannot yield an overall 85 percentile.
  • Another participant suggests that normalizing both GPA and supplemental application scores to z-scores and then averaging them changes the outcome, indicating that the resulting score would need to be normalized again.
  • There is a discussion about the variance of the weighted average of z-scores, with calculations provided for the variance and standard deviation based on the weights of GPA and supplemental application scores.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and assumptions, particularly regarding the linearity of the weighting and the normalization process.
  • One participant shares anecdotal evidence that students with GPA percentiles in the 55-65 range can still gain admission based on their supplemental applications, seeking to quantify the required supplemental score.
  • A later reply questions the reasoning behind the variance being equal to the square of the weight percentages, indicating a need for clarification on this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the linear weighting assumption and the implications of normalizing scores. There is no consensus on the correct approach or final calculations, as multiple interpretations and methods are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the assumptions made about the normalization and weighting of scores may not fully capture the complexities of the admissions process, and there are unresolved questions about the mathematical steps involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in college admissions processes, students preparing applications, or those studying statistics and z-scores in the context of weighted averages.

ACHQ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
SO the entrance to a college is based off of two factors: 54% grade point average, and 46% supplemental application. Both factors are standardized by the college using a z-score.

If a student is ranked in the only ~55 percentile for his grade point average, what percentile rank (approximately) would be needed on their supplemental application in order to be among the ~85 percentile of applicants?

(This is not homework and relates to an actual application)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ACHQ said:
SO the entrance to a college is based off of two factors: 54% grade point average, and 46% supplemental application. Both factors are standardized by the college using a z-score.

If a student is ranked in the only ~55 percentile for his grade point average, what percentile rank (approximately) would be needed on their supplemental application in order to be among the ~85 percentile of applicants?

(This is not homework and relates to an actual application)

Thanks

I'm going to base my calculations off the assumption that your percentile is calculated using the formula:

Final Percentile = 100 x [ (Percentile Probability of GPA From Normal Distribution) x 0.54
+ (Percentile of Supplemental Application) x 0.46 ]
= 100 x [0.54 x P1 + 0.46 x P2] %

We are given in your example P1 = 0.55, and you want Final Percentile (FP) = 85%.

Using some algebra we get:

85 = 100 x [0.54 x 0.55 + 0.46 x P2] (P2 is supp application percentile probability)

Arranging terms and solving for P2 we get

P2 = 1.202173913

This means with 55 percentile for GPA you can not possibly get 85% percentile.

If you want to know the maximum percentile let P2 = 1 (100% percentile) and you find that your maximum overall percentile is 0.46 + 0.55 x 0.54 = 0.757 or roughly 76% percentile (rounded up)

In the above I'm assuming 99 percentile is top 1% and that the percentiles are weighted like you said above (54% GPA, the rest application).
 
I'm reading the question a little different chiro. I'm thinking that if they normalize both the GPA and the Supp to Z scores and then form the weighted average of those two Z scores, then the result will no longer be a Z score and will have to get normalized again - which changes the outcome somewhat.

Here's my thinking on this.

Start with Z score, N(0,1), and times by 0.54. The resulting variance is 0.54^2 x 1^2. And similar for the other one.

Let X3 = 0.54 Z1 + 0.46 Z2. This the sum of normal RV's variance 0.54^2 and 0.46^2 therefore variance of X3 is 0.54^2 + 0.46^2 = 0.5032. (stdev = 0.7094).

So X3 is not as yet a Z score since the variance in not unity. So we need to use Z3 = X3/sd3 which is normal.

Putting it all together, for the percentiles the OP states when can look up the normal cdf and find we have Z1=0.15, Z2=? and Z3=1.04

[tex]Z_3 = \frac{0.54 Z_1 + 0.46 Z_2 }{0.7094}[/tex]

Putting in the given data and solving for Z2 I get Z2=1.43, corresponding to about the 92nd to 93rd percentile.

I think this is correct but to be honest I'm not 100% sure.
 
Yeah I think you're right uart. The assumption that the weights are purely linear is probably not the best way to describe the problem.

I'd be interested in what the OP has to say about this issue.
 
The linear assumption isn't really correct. The reason being is that they normalize both the GPA and the Supp to Z scores and then take the top ~15% of the "weighted average score". uart seems to be on the right track, I myself couldn't figure out the math behind it, but that number 92-93rd percentile seems to make sense.

I know for a fact that individuals that score in the 55-65 percentile for the GPA component do get into that college, based off of their supplemental application. I just wanted to put a number estimate on how stellar of a supplemental application one would need if they fell into that GPA range.

Thanks!
 
uart said:
I'm reading the question a little different chiro. I'm thinking that if they normalize both the GPA and the Supp to Z scores and then form the weighted average of those two Z scores, then the result will no longer be a Z score and will have to get normalized again - which changes the outcome somewhat.

Here's my thinking on this.

Start with Z score, N(0,1), and times by 0.54. The resulting variance is 0.54^2 x 1^2. And similar for the other one.

Let X3 = 0.54 Z1 + 0.46 Z2. This the sum of normal RV's variance 0.54^2 and 0.46^2 therefore variance of X3 is 0.54^2 + 0.46^2 = 0.5032. (stdev = 0.7094).

So X3 is not as yet a Z score since the variance in not unity. So we need to use Z3 = X3/sd3 which is normal.

Putting it all together, for the percentiles the OP states when can look up the normal cdf and find we have Z1=0.15, Z2=? and Z3=1.04

[tex]Z_3 = \frac{0.54 Z_1 + 0.46 Z_2 }{0.7094}[/tex]

Putting in the given data and solving for Z2 I get Z2=1.43, corresponding to about the 92nd to 93rd percentile.

I think this is correct but to be honest I'm not 100% sure.

So if the college's admission criteria were: 27% GPA, 27% Standardized test, 46% Supplementary application (again all have been Z-scored individually), would the same formula still apply, except instead of the variance being 0.54^2 + 0.46^2 = 0.5032 (stdev = 0.7094). It would be 0.27^2 + 0.27^2 +0.46^2 = 0.3974 (stdev = 0.5978)?
 
Yes, that would be correct. The weighted sum of the Z-scores would not itself be a z-score but could be considered a random variable with zero mean and stdev of approx 0.5978 as you calculated. So dividing it by this stdev will turn it back into a z-score.
 
uart said:
Yes, that would be correct. The weighted sum of the Z-scores would not itself be a z-score but could be considered a random variable with zero mean and stdev of approx 0.5978 as you calculated. So dividing it by this stdev will turn it back into a z-score.

Ok I get everything except for one thing...

Why is the variance of each sum equal to : 0.27^2, 0.27^2, 0.46^2 respectively (i.e. why is the variance equal to the %weight squared?)

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K