I Zeno's paradoxes of motion in physics

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnny5454
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Physics
Johnny5454
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible, then how does an electron reach the electrostatic field of another electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible

Motion is possible. Your fingers moved as you typed your message, did they not?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes mattt, Demystifier, dextercioby and 2 others
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible
False premise. That was easy...

1604184034789.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes phinds, Dale and DaveC426913
Yeah. I'm not sure what the problem is here. They aren't true.

I believe it was the invention/discovery of instantaneous velocity that solved them.

His paradoxen are based on the assumption that, if one measures the velocity of an object at an instant in time (i.e. duration = zero), one must get velocity of zero. Not true.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
None of the Zeno's paradox is in fact a paradox. He simply created infinite series from simple situations, but the mathematics about limits was evolved enough to solve the problems he had created.
 
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true

As several posters have already remarked, they aren't.

Since the OP question is based on a mistaken premise, this thread is closed.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top