I Zeno's paradoxes of motion in physics

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnny5454
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Physics
Click For Summary
Zeno's paradoxes are not considered true, as they are based on flawed premises about motion. The discussion highlights that motion is evident in everyday actions, such as typing. The concept of instantaneous velocity has been identified as a key factor in resolving these paradoxes. The mathematical understanding of limits has evolved, disproving Zeno's claims. Ultimately, the consensus is that Zeno's paradoxes do not pose a real challenge to the concept of motion.
Johnny5454
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible, then how does an electron reach the electrostatic field of another electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible

Motion is possible. Your fingers moved as you typed your message, did they not?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes mattt, Demystifier, dextercioby and 2 others
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true and motion is impossible
False premise. That was easy...

1604184034789.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes phinds, Dale and DaveC426913
Yeah. I'm not sure what the problem is here. They aren't true.

I believe it was the invention/discovery of instantaneous velocity that solved them.

His paradoxen are based on the assumption that, if one measures the velocity of an object at an instant in time (i.e. duration = zero), one must get velocity of zero. Not true.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
None of the Zeno's paradox is in fact a paradox. He simply created infinite series from simple situations, but the mathematics about limits was evolved enough to solve the problems he had created.
 
Johnny5454 said:
if zeno's paradoxes are true

As several posters have already remarked, they aren't.

Since the OP question is based on a mistaken premise, this thread is closed.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...