Zero Divisor Help: Prove & Example

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter corkscrew062
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of zero divisors in the context of ring theory, specifically addressing the relationship between commutative rings and ring isomorphisms. It establishes that if \( x \) is a zero divisor in a commutative ring \( R \), then \( f(x) \) is a zero divisor in the ring \( S \) when \( f: R \longrightarrow S \) is a ring isomorphism. An example is provided using \( \mathbb{Z}_6 \), which contains zero divisors, to illustrate that the property does not hold if \( R \) is not isomorphic to \( S \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings
  • Knowledge of ring isomorphisms
  • Familiarity with zero divisors in algebra
  • Basic concepts of modular arithmetic, specifically \( \mathbb{Z}_n \)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of zero divisors in various commutative rings
  • Explore ring isomorphisms and their implications in algebra
  • Investigate examples of non-isomorphic rings and their zero divisor properties
  • Learn about quotient rings and their role in modular arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators interested in ring theory, particularly those exploring the concepts of zero divisors and ring isomorphisms.

corkscrew062
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Came across this problem while reading and I can't understand what it wants. I've tried solving for units to get zero divisors but that doesn't work. It's not the end of the world if I can't figure it out, it's just bothering me because I'm confused. Here's the problem: Let $R$ and $S$ be commutative rings, and let $f:R\longrightarrow S$ be a ring isomorphism. Prove if $x$ is a zero divisor in $R$, then $f(x)$ is a zero divisor in $S$. Give an example to show that it is not necessarily true if $R\not \simeq S$.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you lack, Sir Lion, is not courage, but a testimonial-so I will give you one.

Rings are terrible beasties-they positively give me fits of apoplexy. That said, one occasionally needs to employ one when one has some -unsavory- business to attend to. So, one must, of needs, descend to the algebraic gutters, and make their acquaintances.

The nicer mannered ones come from the integral school, however, even some of these have produced some rather badly-quotiented offspring, as if dividing by zero wasn't OH SO 20th century. Egads!

You might, for example, consider the modulated by 6 variety, and think of some choice...no prime! idealization it contains which would render the zero-dividing nonsense totally harmless.

(No, seriously-look at $\Bbb Z_6$ which has zero divisors, and consider the ring $\Bbb Z_6/(\overline{2})$).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
986
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K