What Are the Best Books and Resources for Physics Beginners?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Be Happy!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for books and resources suitable for beginners in physics. Participants explore the distinction between learning physics and merely learning about physics, while sharing their experiences and suggestions for effective study materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for book recommendations, currently struggling with "A Brief History" and seeking to understand "The Tao of Physics."
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of math skills, suggesting that true learning of physics requires a solid foundation in Integral Calculus and entry-level textbooks.
  • Some participants characterize popular science books as "coffee table books" that do not teach physics in a rigorous way, while acknowledging their value for general understanding.
  • Specific popular science books are recommended, including "In Search of Schrödinger's Cat," "The Elegant Universe," and "The Universe in a Nutshell," with a note that these books provide a simplified view of physics concepts.
  • One participant critiques "The Tao of Physics," arguing that it leans more towards metaphysics and is not a suitable resource for learning physics.
  • A participant reflects on the diverse backgrounds of forum members, noting that both passionate learners and knowledgeable graduates contribute to the richness of discussions.
  • Another participant shares their personal struggle with physics, questioning whether to take a physics course in the future.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the distinction between learning physics and learning about physics, but there is disagreement regarding the value of specific books, particularly "The Tao of Physics." The discussion remains unresolved on which resources are most effective for true learning.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for a strong mathematical foundation to fully grasp physics concepts, while others point out that popular science books may not adequately prepare one for deeper study.

Who May Find This Useful

Beginners in physics, educators seeking resources for students, and individuals interested in popular science literature may find this discussion relevant.

Be Happy!
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am relatively "new" to physics and I would love to get some advice from you physics "experts." :)

I would like some suggestions on interesting books to read about physics. I am currently crawling through A Brief History (finding it tough to grasp) and have also picked up Simply einstein- Demystifying Relativity...My short term goal is to get to a point of understanding with which I can grasp "The Tao of Physics."

Any suggestions for books or other ways of learning physics would be most appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends, do you wish to learn physics or learn ABOUT physics. If you wish to learn ABOUT physics continue reading the coffee table physics books as you are currently doing.

If you wish to learn PHYSICS, sharpen your math skills through Integral Calculus, then get a good entry level textbook and go to work. Learning physics is not easy, but can be very rewarding. Learning ABOUT physics is easy, but there will always be something missing.
 
yeah like integral said, those are coffee table books (nothing aginst them i have small library's worth) that are about physics, but don't really teach physics. Physics is inherently mathematical, something that those books do skip around, partially because only an incredibly tiny percent of people can actually understand the mathematics involved (if i recall correctly, physics PhDs are "supposed" to be in the top 1% of educated people, so figure 2% of people can actually understand the math involved in the most advanced concepts).

Don't let that discourage you, entry level physics is much simpler than the stuff I'm talking about, and everyone has to start somewhere. I find that for me, the easiest way to truly learn physics, and not just about physics, is to go out and buy the relevant texts (though this can get expensive, so borrowing is good too) and working through them. I'm actually only graduating from high school this spring, so everything I've learned thus far I've learned from self-study.

Topics to study from the beginning:
Single-variable calculus
Newtonian Mechanics (also called classical mechanics)
Electromagnetic theory
Fluid and Thermal Physics


That stuff is all comparatively simple, and is actually taught in AP Physics in Highschools here in the US.

Also, as always, if there's anytihng you need help with, just ask.
 
I second Integral and franznietzsche.

Now, regarding sci pop books, I would say go for what you like. Some of them are especially good in terms of style and supported information, like John's Gribbin's "In search of Schrödinger's cat", Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe", Stephen Hawking's "The Universe in a Nutshell" or Leon Lederman's "The God Particle"... there are lots to choose from, and they all usually start with a general introduction that explains the concepts they will build upon. They are not like school courses, where you need to understand Calc I in order to make sense of Calc II. You probably can start right off with the Tao of Physics.

If this is the kind of book you are looking for, go for them; just bear in mind that these books give a (very!) watered-down version of what it means to do research in physics.
 
And I would like to agree with the three of you! (Aren't we just one big happy family here? :))

Integral hits it right on the head - that there is a difference in learning physics and learning about physics.

However, one of the books that was mentioned is not something I would recommend to learn about physics - The Tao of Physics. Metaphysics isn't physics although many people would like to think so. I would even be hesitant to say it is about physics. One can do much better with other more interesting pop-sci books than this one.

Zz.
 
Youll find a real good mix of people who now about physics and see it as a personnal passion and those who have learned physics who can put the meat on the bones on lot of what is discussed. I personally fall in the former cateogory. This sometimes has an interesting twist to some threads as we are not constrained by the detailed knowledge that say physics grads have and we can therefore send them down avenues they possible hadnt thought of. Thats what makes this forum great with such a wide mix of knowledge.

Go for what ever suites you but if you like to actually undestand and be able to mess with the basics of the concepts discussed you really need to learn physics and not just about it.

Rog. (a knower not a learner) :)
 
I like physics a lot but I find it hard, It takes me a while to get things and I find bio easy, but I hate it cause its so boring. should I take physics next year?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K