Thread Closed

Fluid Mechanics::'Deriving' Incompressible Flow Criteria

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Nov11-09, 01:44 PM   #1
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Fluid Mechanics::'Deriving' Incompressible Flow Criteria


Here we go....

My text attempts to 'derive' an expression that explains when a flow is compressible or not:

]When is a given flow approximately incompressible? We can derive a nice criterion by playing a little fast and loose with density approximations....
Great ... if there's anything I like better than making density approximations, it's playing 'fast and loose' with them.

He then goes on to say:
..In essence, we wish to slip the density out of the divergence in the continuity equation and approximate a typical term as
[tex]\frac{\partial{}}{\partial{x}} (\rho u)\approx\rho\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} \qquad (1)[/tex]

This is equivalent to the strong inequality

[tex]

|u\frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{x}}|\ll |\rho\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}| \qquad (2)

[/tex]

or

[tex]

|\frac{\delta\rho}{\rho}|\ll|\frac{\delta V}{V}| \qquad (3)
[/tex]
I am completly baffled as to how we went from (1) to (2) ...let alone from (2) to (3)?
Any thoughts?

Casey
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Study provides better understanding of water's freezing behavior at nanoscale
>> Soft matter offers new ways to study how ordered materials arrange themselves
>> Making quantum encryption practical
Nov11-09, 03:47 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Hi Casey!

∂(ρu)/∂x = u∂ρ/∂x + ρ∂u/∂x,

so if u∂ρ/∂x << ρ∂u/∂x, we can ignore it, and then ∂(ρu)/∂x ~ ρ∂u/∂x.

(2) to (3) is simply rearrangement (and changing u to V for some reason which escapes me)
Nov11-09, 04:07 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Oh...that darned chain rule! Thanks tiny-tim.

Also, silly question, but why did we change the ∂'s into [itex]\delta[/itex]'s ?

Is it because the (∂x)'s 'canceled' and thus it is no longer a derivative, but just a relation between 'changes?'
Nov11-09, 04:09 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Fluid Mechanics::'Deriving' Incompressible Flow Criteria


(2) to (3) is based upon the fact that this argument must be repeated for the v and w-components as well, and hence, that the relative infinitesemal change in density must be much less than the relative infinitesemal change in the maximal velocity component, and hence, much less than the relative infinitesemal change in the fluid speed.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Fluid Mechanics::'Deriving' Incompressible Flow Criteria
Thread Forum Replies
Fluid Mechanics: Inviscid flow v.s. Laminar flow Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1
Difference between incompressible viscous and incompressible inviscid flow. General Physics 1
Fluid Mechanics: streamlines for a flow Advanced Physics Homework 0
incompressible fluid flow. Mechanical Engineering 7
Fluid Mechanics - Pipe Flow Mechanical Engineering 11