Laplace transform of dirac delta function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Laplace transform of the Dirac delta function, denoted as L{δ(t-k)}, results in exp(-sk) for k > 0. The discussion highlights a misapplication of the formula L{F'(t)} = sF(s) - F(0) - [F(t0+0) - F(t0-0)]exp(-st0) when applied to the unit step function S. The correct interpretation involves recognizing that the term [F(t0+0) - F(t0-0)]exp(-st0) accounts for the impulse at the discontinuity, and the function f(s) should reflect the original function without the discontinuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Dirac delta function and its applications
  • Knowledge of the Unit Step function and its behavior
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation and continuity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Laplace transform, focusing on discontinuities
  • Learn about the implications of the Dirac delta function in signal processing
  • Explore the Unit Step function and its role in control systems
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying Laplace transform formulas
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students studying control theory or signal processing who need a deeper understanding of the Laplace transform and its application to discontinuous functions.

Kambiz_Veshgini
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
let S be the Unit Step function

for a function with a finite jump at t0 we have:

(*) L{F'(t)}=s f(s)-F(0)-[F(t0+0)-F(t0-0)]*exp(-s t0)]

so:

L{S'(t-k)}=s exp(-s k)/s-0-[1-0]*exp(-s k) = 0 & k>0

but S'(t-k)=deltadirac(t-k) and we know that L{deltadirac(t-k)}=exp(-s k)

so why do I get ZERO when using the formula (*)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kambiz_Veshgini said:
let S be the Unit Step function

for a function with a finite jump at t0 we have:

(*) L{F'(t)}=s f(s)-F(0)-[F(t0+0)-F(t0-0)]*exp(-s t0)]

Ok, I'm not familiar with that one, but I think you're mis-applying it.

The expression I'm familar with is just the L{F'(t)}=s f(s)-F(0) part.

My suspicion is that the [F(t0+0)-F(t0-0)]*exp(-s t0)] is just inserted to manually take care of the dirac impulse that results from the finite discontinuity and that in this case the f(s) you should be using is that of the original function without the discontinuity. Note that the unit step without the step is a pretty simple function. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K