Does Cutting a Spring in Half Change Its Spring Constant K?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of cutting a spring in half on its spring constant, denoted as "k". Participants explore the relationship between the spring's length and its spring constant, questioning how these factors interact.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider whether cutting the spring affects its spring constant, with some suggesting that "k" might double while others argue it remains unchanged. There are discussions about the definitions of displacement and the implications of cutting the spring.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes varying viewpoints on the relationship between spring length and spring constant, with some participants providing insights into the assumptions underlying their reasoning. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is occurring regarding the nature of the spring constant.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of assumptions related to the type of spring and its physical properties, such as material and coil configuration. The discussion also touches on the distinction between the spring's physical length and its mechanical properties.

physicsstudent12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
if you cut a spring with a constant "k" in half, does the new spring's "k" change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think would happen and why?

:wink:
 
I'm not sure, I was thinking that the "k" would double, because by cutting the spring in half you are reducing the spring's displacement.
 
When you cut it in two you are not changing the displacement at all. That is, if by the displacement you mean how much you are compressing it.
 
okay, so now I'm really confused.
My other idea about the question was that maybe the "k" doesn't change at all, because it is a constant, so it is not effected by the change in the size of the spring.
 
The units for the constant are in F/L where the L refers to the length of compression. Does it say anything about the spring's actual length?
 
Hey, Fred Garvin, thanks for replying, but there's nothing about the actual length of the spring. I don't need an exact numerical value, I just need to know if the spring constant changes, and if so, how does it change.
 
I think I found out the answer to my question. I think that k would be doubled, because the force of the spring is the same, and the length of compression is reduced. Can anybody tell me if that's right?
 
No

The spring constant does not change.

:smile: :smile:
 
  • #10
physicsstudent12 said:
Hey, Fred Garvin, thanks for replying, but there's nothing about the actual length of the spring. I don't need an exact numerical value, I just need to know if the spring constant changes, and if so, how does it change.
What I was trying to get at was that the spring constant is a function of material and the way it is wound. It is not a function of the overall length of the spring. The only thing that cutting a spring in half does is halves the total distance you can compress it before you reach the spring's solid height.
 
  • #11
I'm not sure, I was thinking that the "k" would double, because by cutting the spring in half you are reducing the spring's displacement.
The tacit assumption I believe you're making is:
- This is in reference to a helically wound compression or extension spring.
- The spring is literally cut in half so that the material, wire diameter and coil diameter stay the same. Only the number of active coils gets reduced by 1/2.

If those are your assumptions, then you are correct. The k will double. The equation for spring constant for such a spring is:

k = d^4 * G / (8 * D^3 * N)

Where d = wire diameter
G = Modulus of rigidity
D = mean diameter of coil
N = Number of active coils
 
  • #12
Thanks for that Q_Goest.

I always had thought it was just a function of the material and the way it was wound.

Sorry PhysicsStudent12 you were right all along :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
938
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
855
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K