Developing with VB.net and Visual Studio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dagenais
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Visual
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of VB.net and Visual Studio for software development, exploring various perspectives on programming languages, development tools, and the merits and drawbacks of proprietary versus open-source solutions. Participants share their experiences and preferences, as well as engage in debates about the effectiveness of different programming environments.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants find VB.net and Visual Studio enjoyable and easy to use, especially with good tutorials.
  • Others express strong aversion to VB, suggesting alternatives like C or Java instead.
  • There is a distinction made between VB.net and earlier versions of Visual Basic, with some noting the requirement of the .net application layer for VB.net.
  • One participant praises Visual Studio for its ability to produce organized code and its functionality across multiple programming languages, including C#.
  • Concerns are raised about the proprietary nature of VB and Visual Studio, with suggestions for open-source alternatives like Kdevelop and Mono.
  • Some participants argue that other languages, such as Fortran and COBOL, are still relevant, while others question the practicality of VB in modern programming contexts.
  • There are critiques of the development experience in Visual Studio, particularly regarding the ease of creating projects from scratch and programming in more complex environments like DirectX or OpenGL.
  • One participant humorously suggests that the future of Microsoft development might involve increasingly complex hardware requirements.
  • There is a call for participants to focus on using tools they are comfortable with, rather than engaging in a debate over preferences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the value of VB.net and Visual Studio, with some supporting its use while others strongly oppose it. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the merits of different programming languages and tools.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention limitations of proprietary languages and tools, while others highlight the benefits of open-source options. There are unresolved questions about the effectiveness of various programming environments and the specific challenges associated with using VB.net.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to software developers considering different programming languages and development environments, particularly those weighing the pros and cons of VB.net and Visual Studio against other options.

Dagenais
Messages
293
Reaction score
4
I've been developing with VB.net with Visual Studio.

Super fun and easy to use if you have a good tutorial.

I suggest most of you try it out.

I wanted to buy my own copy of Visual Studio, but it's highly overpriced.

I'll probably just buy a regular version of Visual Basic.net. Hopefully it's just as easy to use.
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
wouldn't touch VB even if I get paid.
why don't you try at least C instead? or Java... ?
 
wouldn't touch VB even if I get paid.

VB.net is different from Visual Basic.
 
Originally posted by Dagenais
VB.net is different from Visual Basic.

In that you need the .net application layer to run the program?

I'll stick to c/c++ thank you very much.
 
I agree. I use Visual Studio .NET at work and it's a great tool! It doesn't write -just- VB, you can also write C# which is what I use it for, and of course many other languages.

Visual Studio is the first development tool I've ever used that WORKS. I mean it really works! It even produces organized, uncluttered code, even in HTML! I'm still an avid supporter of plain-text programming or even assembly-level programming if you have the skill, but if you don't, Visual Studio is a life saver. You might want a dual-monitor setup though...

P.S. - Stop hating. Any language has its benefits, even VB. Even Fortran and COBOL are still used to this day!
 
Originally posted by dduardo
In that you need the .net application layer to run the program?

I'll stick to c/c++ thank you very much.


The code is suppose to be really different.


I believe you can use Visual Studio for C++. Why not spend the money and make your life easier? :wink: :wink:

Click me. You know you wanna.
 
Originally posted by Pergatory
Visual Studio is the first development tool I've ever used that WORKS. I mean it really works! It even produces organized, uncluttered code, even in HTML! I'm still an avid supporter of plain-text programming or even assembly-level programming if you have the skill, but if you don't, Visual Studio is a life saver. You might want a dual-monitor setup though...

P.S. - Stop hating. Any language has its benefits, even VB. Even Fortran and COBOL are still used to this day!

1) what other development tools did you try that were soooo lame?
2) Yes that's true a dual-monitor setup for this version... And a monitor wall with specialized video server for the next version... And maybe a hologhraphic display with smell generation and mind reading interface for the Longhorn version... does that seems like a Microsoft development pattern?
3) PIC assembler is probably more used than VB. Fortran and COBOL are used mainly for maintenence purpose. I didn't hear about Apache or WMP ported to Fortran yet...

Nobody's hating anthing. we are just showing the perils of a proprietary programming language...
 
Last edited:
Here are some open source IDEs that don't cost a dime. I've used both Visual Studios and Kdevelop and I have to say the Kdevelop is the better of the two.

www.kdevelop.org
http://www.eclipse.org/

If you really want to do .NET you should look into Mono. It is an open source implementation that can run on a host of systems.

http://developer.ximian.com/projects/mono/

Also, GCC is much more mature than Micrsoft's compiler, and produces better output files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/

-------------

Yes every language has a purpose, but I would rather choose a non-proprietary language that I know 10-20 years down the road i'll be able to still run my programs on almost any type of hardware I have.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
1) what other development tools did you try that were soooo lame?

That's all you've got?

You dislike VB because you hear it's "lame"?
 
  • #11
you really should read more than one line in a post before responding... eventualy the post it was addressed to ... you know to feel the context ...
 
  • #12
2) Yes that's true a dual-monitor setup for this version... And a monitor wall with specialized video server for the next version... And maybe a hologhraphic display with smell generation and mind reading interface for the Longhorn version... does that seems like a Microsoft development pattern?
3) PIC assembler is probably more used than VB. Fortran and COBOL are used mainly for maintenence purpose. I didn't hear about Apache or WMP ported to Fortran yet...

Real convincing. Nothing related to Visual Studio.
 
  • #13
you seem to have an obsession with Visual Studio. Have YOU tried anything else?

And don't get me started on Windows programming. You say VB is great and fabulous. have you tried to open a Empty project (yes, it is an option in Visual Studio very often overlooked by coll Windoze programmers) and try to make a window from pure code? have you tried to program something in DirectX or even OpenGL? have you tried to do a driver in Win?

first do this in your sweet VB then tell me how many months did it take and then hurry and recommend something just because it makes beautiful windows when generated by a script you don't understand...
 
  • #14
YAFW = Yet Another Flame War

Come on guys. You keep on making me close threads because the discussion goes from topic to Windows versus Linux.

Just use the tool that your more confortable with that does the job
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K