Mysterious Russian Aircraft From Beyond 2000

  • Thread starter Thread starter SkepticJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Russian
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a prototype aircraft from Russia featured on the show Beyond 2000, characterized by its unique design lacking traditional wings and incorporating rectangular holes in its shell. Participants explore the aircraft's specifications, its unfinished status, and comparisons to other aircraft designs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a Russian prototype aircraft with a design featuring no traditional wings, suggesting it utilized internal wings and airflow through its shell.
  • Another participant provides links to external resources, possibly for further information or images related to the aircraft.
  • A comparison is made between the discussed aircraft and the B-2 bomber, indicating some conceptual similarities in design.
  • Participants express appreciation for the aircraft's design, with one noting its unconventional nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specifics of the aircraft or its design implications, and multiple viewpoints regarding its characteristics and comparisons to other aircraft remain present.

Contextual Notes

Details about the aircraft's funding status and the completeness of its design are mentioned but not elaborated upon, leaving some assumptions about its development and operational status unresolved.

SkepticJ
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Years ago on the now defunct show Beyond 2000 there was a prototype aircraft being built in Russia that had no wings as such. Its shell had rectangle holes in it that I guess let air get in and flow over tiny internal wings or something. Anyone know what I'm talking about? It was big but not as big as a commercial airliner and was about half as wide as it was long. It was never finished as far as I know. They lost funding I think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would call that an out of the box design ... but the expression doesn't quite apply ... :biggrin: .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 194 ·
7
Replies
194
Views
60K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K