Heavy elements from neutron star collisions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that heavy elements, specifically gold and platinum, are primarily produced in neutron star collisions rather than in supernovae. Participants explore the implications of recent observations from LIGO regarding neutron star mergers and their role in the creation of these elements, as well as the historical context of heavy element formation theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the idea of neutron star mergers as a source of heavy elements has gained traction, particularly in light of recent observations, but it was not a new concept.
  • One participant references a Nature paper that supports the hypothesis of neutron star mergers contributing to the r-process elements, which are neutron-rich elements heavier than iron.
  • Evidence from the Reticulum II dwarf galaxy suggests that the r-process material found there could not be produced by ordinary core-collapse supernovae, aligning with the neutron star merger hypothesis.
  • Questions are raised about the specifics of mass ejection during neutron star collisions, including the percentage of mass ejected as heavy elements and the role of rotation in the original neutron stars.
  • It is suggested that the ejected material is initially dense neutron star matter that decays into heavy neutron-rich isotopes, with a reference to a figure showing the distribution of resulting elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the potential role of neutron star mergers in heavy element formation, but there are unresolved questions regarding the specifics of mass ejection and the mechanisms involved. No consensus is reached on the details of the processes or the implications of the observations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the historical perspective on heavy element formation, noting that supernovae were traditionally viewed as the primary source until challenges in explaining certain r-process elements arose. There are also uncertainties regarding the calculations of mass ejected and the conditions under which elements are formed.

maline
Messages
436
Reaction score
69
I have seen it claimed online that the recently announced observation of a neutron-star merger by LIGO provides strong support for the hypothesis that heavy elements - gold and platinum were mentioned in particular - are mostly created in neutron-star collisions rather than in supernovas. Is this correct? Where can I find reliable information about this story?

In fact, where can I read about this hypothesis at all? Until today supernovas were the only source I heard mentioned for elements not created in the normal stellar fusion reactions.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
maline said:
In fact, where can I read about this hypothesis at all? Until today supernovas were the only source I heard mentioned for elements not created in the normal stellar fusion reactions.

I have no source, but I heard about that mechanism many years ago. Thus it is not really new.
 
Wikipedia is always a good place to start. I think until about 2000 or so, it was thought that supernovae were the main source of all heavy elements. However, there were problems with getting enough of the "r-process" elements, which are neutron rich elements heavier than iron. The hypothesis that most of these elements come from decompressed neutron star material flung into interstellar space during neutron star mergers has been gaining favor. This recent Nature paper claims support for that hypothesis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and maline
A key piece of evidence for this scenario emerged recently with the discovery of extremely high levels of r-process elements in the Reticulum II dwarf galaxy, which orbits the Milky Way. "This implies that a single rare event produced the r-process material in Reticulum II. The r-process yield and event rate are incompatible with ordinary core-collapse supernovae, but consistent with other possible sites, such as neutron star mergers." Link: ArXiv
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: maline
This article claims around 1% of the combined mass was ejected as heavy elements. Anyone know how they got that number. Does it eject iron too? Why not?

How much can rotation in the original neutron stars change the mass ejected?
 
stefan r said:
This article claims around 1% of the combined mass was ejected as heavy elements. Anyone know how they got that number. Does it eject iron too? Why not?

How much can rotation in the original neutron stars change the mass ejected?
I would think that what is emitted is initially Neutron star matter, which is mostly dense neutrons. This decays into heavy neutron rich isotopes. Within the neutron star, there are no atomic nuclei except perhaps in an outer skin.
 
As PAllen said, what is ejected is dense neutron star matter, which rapidly decays into a whole host of heavy elements. below is Figure 4 from this Arxiv paper, which shows the distribution of elements that result. One of the reasons people favor this model is that it seems to reproduce the observed abundances of heavy elements in the Solar System.

NS_Elements.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K