Why Is Chaos Deterministic and Not Random?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of chaos, specifically exploring why chaotic systems are considered deterministic rather than random. Participants examine the characteristics of chaotic behavior, its predictability, and how it differs from randomness, with examples from engineering and theoretical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that chaos is deterministic behavior characterized by sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where small changes can lead to vastly different outcomes.
  • Others describe systems as having three operational modes: predictable (linear), chaotic (nonlinear), and random, with chaos positioned between predictability and randomness.
  • One participant uses the example of buildings swaying in the wind to illustrate how chaotic behavior can remain within certain engineering limits, contrasting it with random motion that lacks such boundaries.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while chaotic trajectories are unpredictable over time, they still operate within a defined envelope of motion, unlike random motion.
  • Some participants reference external articles to support their claims, noting that chaos theory demonstrates how deterministic systems can yield chaotic results that may appear random but are not technically so.
  • A participant provides visual examples to differentiate chaotic behavior from random behavior, indicating that while future paths in chaotic systems cannot be predicted, they are not random.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between chaos and randomness, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the deterministic nature of chaos, while others question the boundaries between chaotic and random behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference external sources and examples to illustrate their points, but the discussion remains open-ended with unresolved nuances regarding definitions and the implications of chaos versus randomness.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying chaos theory, engineering principles related to dynamic systems, or anyone exploring the philosophical implications of determinism and randomness in scientific contexts.

student-engineer
Chaos is deterministic behavior.Why is chaos deterministic.Why chaos is not random.
Chaos is sensitive dependence on initial conditions,a slight change in initial condition can give rise to totally different trajectories.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Systems have three modes of operation:
- predictable (linear)
- chaotic (nonlinear)
- random (random)

Chaos appears between the predictable mode and the random mode. In a sense, chaos provides a wider envelope of motion for a system where we can't predict the motion but we know the motion won't go outside the envelope either. Also in chaotic systems we may see patterns that appear for a time and then new patterns emerge.

Buildings sway in any wind. For small winds, the sway is pretty linear, pretty predictable. For larger winds, the sway becomes chaotic, not predictable but within the engineering limits (envelope of motion) of the building. For really large winds, the building may be driven beyond chaotic to random and then failure occurs and the building collapses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Chaos vs Random

http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: student-engineer
jedishrfu said:
Systems have three modes of operation:
- predictable (linear)
- chaotic (nonlinear)
- random (random)

Chaos appears between the predictable mode and the random mode. In a sense, chaos provides a wider envelope of motion for a system where we can't predict the motion but we know the motion won't go outside the envelope either. Also in chaotic systems we may see patterns that appear for a time and then new patterns emerge.

Buildings sway in any wind. For small winds, the sway is pretty linear, pretty predictable. For larger winds, the sway becomes chaotic, not predictable but within the engineering limits (envelope of motion) of the building. For really large winds, the building may be driven beyond chaotic to random and then failure occurs and the building collapses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Chaos vs Random

http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness
Random is something which is not predictable.Chaotic trajectories are also not predictable,so why is chaos not random.

In the article http://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/level23intro.html it is also mentioned,' Chaos theory has shown that deterministic systems can produce results which are chaotic and appear to be random. But they are not technically random because the events can be modeled by a (non-linear) formula.'
Is this the reason
 
The chaotic trajectory isn't predictable over a longer period of time but it still operates in a given envelope of motion whereas random motion has no such envelope. Think of the building example I gave.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: student-engineer
lorenz3d.gif


The picture is an example of chaotic behavior. We can't predict the exact path in the future, but it is also clear from the picture that the behavior is not random. Below is an example of random.

run.gif
 

Attachments

  • lorenz3d.gif
    lorenz3d.gif
    46.3 KB · Views: 1,120
  • run.gif
    run.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 1,035
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: student-engineer and jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
817
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K