Earthed plates confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter tellmesomething
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of electric fields and potentials in a system of four conducting plates with charges Q, -2Q, 4Q, and 3Q, where the third plate is grounded. Participants clarify that grounding the third plate alters the charge distribution, resulting in a final net charge of zero on the system. The confusion arises from the assumption that the outer surfaces must have zero charge, which is incorrect. Gauss's law is emphasized as a more reliable method for analyzing the electric field rather than relying solely on work done against the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of electric fields and potentials in conductive materials
  • Familiarity with charge distribution in grounded systems
  • Basic concepts of electric flux and surface charge density
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's law applications in electrostatics
  • Explore charge distribution in multiple conductive plates
  • Learn about electric field calculations in grounded conductors
  • Investigate the implications of grounding on electric potential
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone studying electrostatics, particularly those interested in charge distribution and electric fields in conductive systems.

  • #31
Steve4Physics said:
indigating
Now I'm confused… you previously mentioned "indagate", an archaic but valid word meaning to investigate, from the Latin "indagare". "Indigate", as used in your post #27 seems like a misspelling of "indicate". Though it could be useful to describe e.g. wagging one's finger at a queue jumper, expressing digital indication of indignation all in one go.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
haruspex said:
Now I'm confused… you previously mentioned "indagate", an archaic but valid word meaning to investigate, from the Latin "indagare". "Indigate", as used in your post #27 seems like a misspelling of "indicate".

I'll explain! In Post #24 you wrote:
haruspex said:

I looked at the link. The first (remarkable) sentence of the abstract is this:

"The foremost grail of this academic indagation is to delineate a mathematical expression of the normalised charge density over a flat disk."

Had to look-up 'indagation' and found it meant search or enquiry.

I then felt an ironic compulsion to use it in subsequent posts. Sorry about that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K