The Electric Displacement, ##\mathbf D##

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Wood
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric displacement field, denoted as ##\mathbf D##, is defined by the equation ##\mathbf D=\epsilon_0\mathbf E + \mathbf P##, where ##\mathbf E## represents electric field strength and ##\mathbf P## signifies polarization. A proposal was made to redefine ##\mathbf D## to have the same units as ##\mathbf E##, suggesting the formulation ##\mathbf D=\mathbf E + \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \mathbf P##. This adjustment is purely a matter of unit choice, with Heaviside Lorentz units providing a more convenient framework as all three quantities share identical units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field strength (##\mathbf E##)
  • Knowledge of polarization (##\mathbf P##)
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric displacement (##\mathbf D##)
  • Basic grasp of unit systems, particularly Heaviside Lorentz units
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Heaviside Lorentz units
  • Study the relationship between electric displacement, electric field, and polarization
  • Explore the implications of unit choice in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the physical significance of the electric displacement field in various materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of electric displacement and its unit systems.

Philip Wood
Gold Member
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
79
TL;DR
Why isn't it defined so that it has the same units as ##\mathbf E##?
We define ##\mathbf D## as ##\mathbf D=\epsilon_0\mathbf E + \mathbf P##, in which ##\mathbf E## is the electric field strength and ##\mathbf P## is the polarisation.

Would it not be more convenient for ##\mathbf D## to be defined in such a way that it had the same units as ##\mathbf E##. In other words as ##\mathbf D=\mathbf E + \frac 1 {\epsilon_0} \mathbf P## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
683
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
602
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
838
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
664
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K