2D rotation and angular momentum uncertainty

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
hokhani
Messages
598
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
How a quantum particle may be confined to a planar rotation?
In quantum mechanics, the uncertainty among the components of the angular momentum doesn't allow to find all the components together. However, when a quantum particle is confined to the ##xy-##plane, it seems that ##L_x## and ##L_y## are both zeros. How about the uncertainty here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean? What do you want to know? In 2D you only have one generation of rotations: ##L_z##.
 
Even in 3D there can be state vectors, such as the hydrogenic atom s orbitals, where all of the angular momentum components have value 0. The uncertainty relation just says that you can't form a complete basis of ##\mathcal{H}## from only vectors that have simultaneously definite ##L_x##, ##L_y## and ##L_z##.
 
hokhani said:
when a quantum particle is confined to the ##xy-##plane, it seems that ##L_x## and ##L_y## are both zeros.
No, when a quantum particle is confined to the ##x y## plane, its Hilbert space is restricted, and there aren't even any such operators as ##L_x## and ##L_y## on vectors in the restricted Hilbert space (there is only one angular momentum operator on that space, ##L_z##). So it doesn't even make sense to talk about any uncertainty relation between ##L_x## and ##L_y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuarkyMeson
hilbert2 said:
Even in 3D there can be state vectors, such as the hydrogenic atom s orbitals, where all of the angular momentum components have value 0. The uncertainty relation just says that you can't form a complete basis of ##\mathcal{H}## from only vectors that have simultaneously definite ##L_x##, ##L_y## and ##L_z##.
Why are we discussing the 3D case now? Anyway, in that case the uncertainty reads
$$\Delta L_x \Delta L_y \geq \frac12 |\langle [L_x,L_y]\rangle|=\frac\hbar 2 |\langle L_z \rangle |=\frac12 \hbar^2 |m_z| $$

as you chose an s-state we have that ##\ell=0## and thus ##m_z=0## so there is no issue with ##\Delta L_x## or ##\Delta L_y## being as small as 0.
 
pines-demon said:
Why are we discussing the 3D case now? Anyway, in that case the uncertainty reads
$$\Delta L_x \Delta L_y \geq \frac12 |\langle [L_x,L_y]\rangle|=\frac\hbar 2 |\langle L_z \rangle |=\frac12 \hbar^2 |m_z| $$

as you chose an s-state we have that ##\ell=0## and thus ##m_z=0## so there is no issue with ##\Delta L_x## or ##\Delta L_y## being as small as 0.
Just to point out that in individual cases, a vector ##\left|\psi\right.\rangle## can be a simultaneous eigenstate of non-commuting observables. If it's angular momentum in question, this can happen when eigenvalues are zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory and pines-demon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
659
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K