Limit behaviour of Fibonacci sequence

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PeroK
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

SUMMARY

The discussion rigorously proves that the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci sequence terms, defined by Fn+1 = Fn + Fn-1 with F1 > F0 ≥ 0, converges to the Golden Ratio φ = (1 + √5)/2. It establishes that the sequence of ratios an = Fn+1/Fn oscillates above and below φ, forming two monotonic subsequences that converge to φ. The key recurrence an+1 = 1 + 1/an and the quadratic equation defining φ are used to prove this limit. Additionally, the closed-form Binet formula for Fibonacci numbers is referenced to confirm the convergence analytically.

PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of Fibonacci sequence recurrence relations
  • Familiarity with the Golden Ratio and its defining quadratic equation
  • Basic real analysis concepts including monotone sequences and limits
  • Knowledge of Binet's formula for Fibonacci numbers and algebraic number fields (e.g., ℚ[√5])

NEXT STEPS

  • Study monotone convergence theorem in real analysis for sequence limits
  • Explore Binet's formula derivation and its applications in linear recurrences
  • Investigate properties of algebraic integers in quadratic fields like ℚ[√5]
  • Analyze stability and oscillation behavior in nonlinear recurrence relations

USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and educators interested in number theory, sequence convergence, and the mathematical properties of the Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Ratio. Also valuable for students learning advanced calculus and algebraic number theory.

PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
29,730
Reaction score
21,582
TL;DR
Ratio of terms in the Fibonacci sequence.
I thought this might be quite interesting to anyone who hasn't seen it before.

Consider any Fibonacci sequence, where ##F_1 > F_0 \ge 0## and ##F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1} \ (n > 1)##. We want to show that the ratio of consecutive terms, ##a_n = \dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_n}## tends to the Golden Ratio: ##\varphi = \dfrac{1 + \sqrt 5}{2}##.

First, note that ##1 \le a_n \le 2 \ (n \ge 1)##. The sequence is increasing and no term can be more than twice the previous term.

Note that:
$$a_{n + 1} = \frac{F_{n+2}}{F_{n+1}} = \frac{F_{n+1} + F_n}{F_{n+1}} = \frac{(a_n + 1)F_n}{a_nF_n} = \frac{a_n + 1}{a_n} = 1 + \frac 1 {a_n}$$Hence:
$$a_{n+1 } > \varphi \ \Leftrightarrow \ 1 + \frac 1 {a_n} > \varphi \ \Leftrightarrow \ a_n < \frac 1{\varphi - 1}= \varphi$$This last equality follows from the characteristic quadratic equation that defines ##\varphi##:
$$\varphi^2 - \varphi -1 = 0 \ \implies \ \varphi(\varphi-1) = 1 \ \implies \ \varphi = \frac 1 {\varphi - 1}$$So:

If ##a_n < \varphi##, then ##a_{n+1} > \varphi##; and, if ##a_n > \varphi##, then ##a_{n+1} < \varphi##.

This means that ##a_n## is composed of two subsequences, alternating between above and below the Golden Ratio.

Note also that if ##a_n = \varphi##, then ##a_{n+1} = \varphi## and the sequence is constant thereafter. This can only happen, however, when ##F_1 = \varphi F_0##.

If you know a bit of real analysis, you see that it is enough to show that the subsequence less than ##\varphi## is strictly increasing; and, the subsequence above ##\varphi## is strictly decreasing. This guarantees that both subsequences converge to ##\varphi## - as that is the only possible limit.

To see this, we need to compare ##a_{n+2}## with ##a_n##:
$$a_{n+2} = \frac{F_{n+3}}{F_{n+2}} = \frac{F_{n+2} + F_{n+1}}{F_{n+1} + F_n} = \frac{(2a_n + 1)F_n}{(a_n+1)F_n} = \frac{2a_n + 1}{a_n +1}$$Hence:
$$a_n - a_{n+2} = \frac{a_n^2 + a_n - 2a_n - 1}{a_n + 1} = \frac{a_n^2 - a_n - 1}{a_n + 1}$$And we see that:

If ##1 < a_n < \varphi##, then ##a_n^2 - a_n - 1 < 0## and ##1 < a_n < a_{n+2} < \varphi##; and

if ##\varphi < a_n##, then ##a_n^2 - a_n - 1 > 0## and ##\varphi < a_{n+2} < a_n##.

And, as required, we have two monotonic subsequences that must both converge to ##\varphi##.

Note that to prove this last bit rigorously, you need some work, which may not add very much here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is a much easier way to arrive at these results.

From ##a_{n+1} = 1 + a_n^{-1}## and the definition of ##\varphi## we can obtain $$
a_{n+1} - \varphi = (-1)\frac{a_n - \varphi}{a_n\varphi}.$$ Assuming ##a_n \geq 1## we have ##a_n \varphi \geq \varphi > 1## so that $$
|a_{n+1} - \varphi| < |a_n - \varphi|.$$ This is sufficient to conclude that ##a_n \to \varphi##. The factor of ##-1## on the right means that if ##a_n < \varphi## then ##a_{n+1} > \varphi## etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and PeroK
pasmith said:
There is a much easier way to arrive at these results.

From ##a_{n+1} = 1 + a_n^{-1}## and the definition of ##\varphi## we can obtain $$
a_{n+1} - \varphi = (-1)\frac{a_n - \varphi}{a_n\varphi}.$$ Assuming ##a_n \geq 1## we have ##a_n \varphi \geq \varphi > 1## so that $$
That is useful.
pasmith said:
|a_{n+1} - \varphi| < |a_n - \varphi|.$$ This is sufficient to conclude that ##a_n \to \varphi##.
I didn't think this was sufficient, as we could have the odd terms and even terms both converging to different limits less than and greater than ##\varphi##.

The additional equation that I thought was needed was:
$$a_n - a_{n+2} = \frac{a_n^2 - a_n - 1}{a_n + 1}$$This ties the odd or even sequence to the function values. Because ##x^2 - x - 1## has only one zero on ##(1, 2)##, the only way that ##a_n^2 - a_n - 1## can tend to zero is if ##a_n## tends to ##\varphi##.
 
Last edited:
A slight correction is indeed required.

From ##a_n \geq 1## we have ##a_n \varphi \geq \varphi ## so that $$
|a_{n+1} - \varphi| \leq \frac{1}{\varphi} |a_n - \varphi|$$ which together with ##\varphi > 1## is sufficient for ##a_n \to \varphi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Alternatively, we can also consider that the general solution of ##F_{n+2} = F_{n+1} + F_n## is $$\begin{split}
F_n &= A \left( \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n + B\left( \frac{1 - \sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n \\
&= A \varphi^n + B (-\varphi^{-1})^n \\
&= \varphi^n \left(A + B (-\varphi^{-2})^{n}\right)
\end{split}
$$ for some constants ##A## and ##B##. For an integer sequence, ##B## must be the conjugate of ##A## in ##\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{5}]## so that if ##A = a + b\sqrt{5}## then ##B = a - b\sqrt{5}## for rational ##a## and ##b##. For the case ##F_0 = 0, F_1 = 1## we in fact have ##a = 0## and ##b = \frac15##.

From the last expression for ##F_n## we have $$
\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n} = \varphi \frac{ A +B \left( - \varphi^{-2} \right)^{n+1} }
{ A + B \left( - \varphi^{-2} \right)^{n} }$$ and some basic analysis shows that as ##n \to \infty## for ##A \neq 0## the fraction tends to 1. It is also easy to see that ##(F_n)## alternates between terms which are greater than and less than ##A\varphi^n##, with ##(F_{n+1}/F_n)## therefore alternatiing between terms which are greater than and less than ##\varphi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K