Can We Conjecture Asymptotic Behavior for Prime Number Series Beyond PNT?

[lokofer]

In fact if PNT says that the series \sum_{p<x}1 \sim Li(x)

My question is if we can't conjecture or prove that:

\sum_{p<x}p^{q} \sim Li(x^{q+1}) \sim \pi(x^{q+1}) q>0

In asymptotic notation...

 

[matt grime]

Of course we can conjecture it, Jose (I presume this a new account for eljose). Have *you* tried to prove it? Does it even seem reasonable? Have you run it through a computer at all? Why do you even think it might be true?

 

[shmoe]

See
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=115133&highlight=conjecture

My suggestion to 'eljose' still applies here "...use partial summation and the prime number theorem including keeping track of error terms."

 

[lokofer]

The main key is that according to the manual..."Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables"..the integral:

\int_{2}^{x} dt \frac{t^n }{log(t)}= A+log(log(x))+\sum_{k>0}(n+1)^{k}\frac{log^{k}}{k. k!}

Using the properties of the logarithms you get that the series above is just Li(x^{n+1}) , in fact using "this" conjecture and prime number theorem you get the (known) asymptotic result:

\sum_{i=1}^{N}p_i \sim (1/2)N^2 log(N)

for the case n=-1, you get that the "Harmonic prime series" diverges as log(log(x)) ...although the constant i give is a bit different.