Need help understanding Current Draw for a Power Amplifier

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the current draw of a power amplifier, specifically the APEX Microtech Power Amplifier PA50, in relation to its power supply configuration and output measurements. Participants explore the implications of using two DC power supplies in series and the behavior of current in relation to inductive loads.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes confusion about drawing 23.4 amps RMS from the amplifier output when the power supplies can only provide a maximum of 10 amps each.
  • Another suggests calculating power to ensure that output power is less than input power, indicating that current can exceed supply current if the output voltage is less than the input voltage.
  • A participant provides specific power measurements, stating the amplifier output power is 248 watts while the power from the supplies is 332 watts, questioning the feasibility of higher output current with DC supplies.
  • Concerns are raised about the need to consider phase angle and power factor when dealing with inductive loads, which could affect current readings.
  • One participant mentions that the 8.3 amps drawn from the power supplies may represent an average current rather than a constant DC current, suggesting that RMS calculations can vary based on waveform shape.
  • Another proposes that each power supply may only provide current for half of the signal cycle, leading to a combined current draw that could explain the higher output current readings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the relationship between the current drawn from the power supplies and the output current of the amplifier. Multiple competing views exist about the interpretation of current measurements and the effects of inductive loads, with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in measurements, such as the assumptions made regarding RMS values and the calibration of measuring equipment. The discussion also notes the complexity introduced by the inductive nature of the load and the phase angle considerations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals working with power amplifiers, particularly in understanding current measurements in relation to inductive loads and power supply configurations.

dsurfer21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm working on a project with a colleague involving amplifying some simple sine waves (20kHz) using an APEX Microtech Power Amplifier PA50

Two power supplies INSTEK SPS-3610 are connected in series and are supplying the amplifier with +/- 20 volts each. Each power supply can provide up to 10 amps (i think that is continuous not peak). The APEX amplifier can output up to 40 amps continuous.

The colleague I am working with has done some measurements with the amplifier and has measured 23.4 amps RMS or 33.4 amps Peak on the output (before the amplifier saturates). He used a hall effect sensor to measure the current going to the load (which is an electromagnet device immersed in a conductive fluid).

I'm confused on how you can draw that much current when your supplies can provide only up to 10 amps maximum. With two power supplies in series, the maximum current provided to the amplifier is 10 amps.

I always thought that for a typical op amp power amplifier, the current on the output of the amplifier is equivalent to the current draw from the supplies. Can anyone help me understand this? I am thinking my argument is wrong or my colleague has not calibrated the hall effect sensor properly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try doing the calculation with power first, to reassure yourself that the power out is less than the power in. Then take a look at the output voltage swing, and see that it is less than the 40V DC input supply voltage. The current out can be more than the current in, as long as the amp is using a switching power supply, and the output voltage is less than the input voltage.
 
Hi,

The output power of the amplifier was 248 watts (10.5 volts RMS, 23.4 amps RMS), and the power from the supplies was 332 watts (8.3 amps at +/- 20 volts)

The power supplies are both DC power supplies, and the amplifier itself doesn't have any switching power supplies.

Is it still possible to have more current flow on the output of the amplifer than from the power supplies (with DC power supplies)?
 
Since you state that your load is an electromagnet (inductor) you can't just read voltage and current.
You need to determine the phase angle (or power factor) involved as well.
 
Hi,

Certainly, for power you have to include a phase angle. I believe that my colleague used a phase angle correction to get the correct output power.

When I had worked on that project while I was a grad student I always accounted for the phase angle.

I'm still lost on whether the current draw from the DC power supplies should be the same at the output of the amplifier.

What confuses me is that he is drawing 8.3 amps from the power supplies in series, and getting 23.4 amps RMS on the output of the Amp

Also, some of the connectors (to the load) he is using are rated at 10 amps with 16 gauge wiring, so i would have expected him to see some failures with those.
 
Last edited:
Anytime you get to measuring power in big inductors there are lots of gotchas.

How about the definition of RMS itself?
A lot of test equipment assumes a sine wave and just applies square root of 2 to peak voltage. If the waveform is not a sine then the number is meaningless.

Since the load is varying the 8.3A shown by the DC power supply meter is some sort of average current. It can not represent a constant DC current.

I'm thinking a crude current foldover sum of the dual 8.3A DC input should get about 16.6A RMS on the amp output (RMS uses peak voltage not peak to peak).
The 23.4A rms isn't that far off from 16A.
 
Here is what cold be happening. You say that the 2 power supplies are wired in series. That may be the case, but I would bet that the +/- node between the 2 supplies is wired to the amplifier. That being the case, one supply provides current for the positive portion of the cycle and the other supply provides current for the negative portion of the cycle. So each supply provides current for half the signal. If we assume the power supply is decoupled from the amplifier well enough to smooth out the current pulses, each half cycle probably draws 16.6 amps. When each half cycle is combined into a sine wave we can assume that there is a total current draw RMS of 16.6 amps. 16.6/23.4 is .709 which happens to be very close to the conversion of RMS to peak. I would guess the hall sensor is calibrated in peak in your case. If so, the numbers come out exactly as they should.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K