Explicit expressions for creation/annihilation operator of the free scalar field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the explicit expressions for the creation and annihilation operators of a free scalar field, specifically defined as a(q) and a†(q). The commutation relation [a(q), a(p)] is derived, leading to the result (q_0 - p_0) δ³(𝑞 - 𝑝) e^(i(q_0 - p_0)t). The final conclusion is that this expression evaluates to zero due to the properties of the delta function, confirming the expected behavior of the operators when q equals p.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly scalar fields.
  • Familiarity with the canonical commutation relations between fields and their conjugate momenta.
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms in three-dimensional space.
  • Proficiency in handling delta functions and their implications in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the canonical commutation relations in quantum field theory.
  • Learn about the role of delta functions in quantum mechanics and field theory.
  • Explore advanced textbooks on quantum field theory, such as "Quantum Field Theory" by Mark Srednicki.
  • Investigate the implications of creation and annihilation operators in particle physics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for quantum physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and particle physics, particularly those studying the mathematical foundations of scalar fields.

masudr
Messages
931
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to work my way through some of my lecture notes, and have hit this snag. (n.b. I use k_0 \equiv +\sqrt{\vec{k}^2 + m^2})

We have
a(q) = \int d^3 x e^{iqx} \{ q_0 \phi(x) + i \pi(x) \}
a^{\dagger}(q) = \int d^3 x e^{-iqx} \{ q_0 \phi(x) - i \pi(x) \}

To calculate the commutation relation between these operators, we simply multiply them out as required, and substitute the canonical commutation relation between fields and their conjugate momenta.

I work through the relatively tedious steps and get

[a(q),a(p)] = \int d^3 x d^3 y e^{i(qx-py)} \delta^3(\vec{x} - \vec{y}) (q_0 - p_0)
= \int d^3 x e^{i(q-p)x} (q_0 - p_0)
= \int d^3 x e^{i(q_0-p_0)x^0} e^{i(\vec{q}-\vec{p})\cdot\vec{x}} (q_0 - p_0)

In my notes, the next step is to replace \vec{q} with \vec{p} and so get 0. However, if we integrate over x, surely we are left with a loose delta function outside an integral, which would mean that [a(q),a(p)] = 0 \Leftarrow q=p which I know is wrong.

Can anyone explain that last step? Any textbooks I've seen assume this is trivial and just go on to state the commutation relation between the creation/annihilation operators rather than calculating it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind. After doing the integral, I got

<br /> (q_0 - p_0) \delta^3(\vec{q}-\vec{p}) e^{i(q_0-p_0)t}<br />

which conspires to be zero when the delta function is non-zero because of the first term in brackets, and is zero everywhere else because of the delta function.
 
Correct!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K