Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around academic and research programs in science, mathematics, and engineering, with a focus on graduate program rankings in various fields such as physics, chemistry, mathematics, and biosciences. Participants share resources and links to rankings, as well as insights into the criteria for evaluating these programs.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants provide links to high energy and particle physics programs worldwide and in the US, listing various national labs.
- Graduate program rankings in physics are shared, with a note that these rankings should be considered rough guides for applicants.
- Similar rankings for graduate programs in chemistry and mathematics are presented, with specific numerical scores assigned to institutions.
- One participant questions the basis of the mathematics rankings and suggests that rankings may vary based on specific areas within mathematics, such as pure or applied mathematics.
- Resources for researching schools and programs are shared, including links to salary information and alumni feedback on various institutions.
- A participant mentions the importance of considering criteria such as the number of PhD graduates, faculty reputation, and funding when evaluating graduate programs.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying opinions on the criteria for rankings and the importance of different factors when selecting graduate programs. There is no consensus on the best approach to evaluating these programs, and multiple competing views remain regarding the significance of rankings and individual research interests.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the potential variability of rankings based on specific areas of study and the subjective nature of criteria used for evaluation. Participants acknowledge the need for personal research to find a good fit for their academic and career goals.