The discussion explores the concept of nonlocality in relation to consciousness and the brain, drawing parallels with subatomic particles and the implications for phenomena such as telepathy and ESP. It touches on philosophical perspectives like panpsychism and idealism, as well as artistic interpretations through Cubism.
Participants express a range of views on the nature of consciousness and its potential nonlocality, with no clear consensus reached. There are competing perspectives on the implications of quantum mechanics for consciousness and the acceptance of phenomena like telepathy.
The discussion includes speculative claims and philosophical interpretations that rely on various assumptions about consciousness, quantum mechanics, and the nature of reality, which remain unresolved.
Jonny_trigonometry said:
RAD4921 said:
quantumcarl said:
RAD4921 said:
quantumcarl said:Cool dude
I agree with the idea of a non-local awareness. It is in keeping with the idea of Cubism from Braques, Piccasso and Cezzan and many later artists like Marcel DuChampes. All the aspects of all things and events are happening simultanieously and Cubism attempts to cram them into one 2D canvas. This is an example of primitive, cybernetic holography.
I also agree with your statement concerning "each part containing the whole." This concept would explain the impression we get of interconnected influences in nature and the expanding conductivity of effect that is explored by Chaos theorists.
The brain is capable of handling the buzz of information going on all around us... and it does. It's a simple physical survival mechanism that disallows this information from reaching one's immediate awareness.
There are some who are able to tap into the perceptions created by ambient, prevailing information. These are the type of people who have stopped listening to the voice of the ego. They are open to the information offered by their experience rather than pre-emptively classifying the experience with pre-conceived notions of "what it will be like". This sort of behaviour does not allow one to be a part of the "Self Aware Universe".
RAD4921 said:You have a very rich vocabulary and I can tell you are well read and very intelligent. I must admit that I was at first intimidated by you because I thought you were a materialist attacking my philosophy of idealism. I also must admit that I quite didn't understand the ideas you first posted and had to read it twice to get what I thought the ideas you were trying to communicate. Thanks for your agreeable response. RAD
PS I can tell from your spelling that you are from Europe
quantumcarl said:Cool dude
I agree with the idea of a non-local awareness. It is in keeping with the idea of Cubism from Braques, Piccasso and Cezzan and many later artists like Marcel DuChampes. All the aspects of all things and events are happening simultanieously and Cubism attempts to cram them into one 2D canvas. This is an example of primitive, cybernetic holography.
I also agree with your statement concerning "each part containing the whole." This concept would explain the impression we get of interconnected influences in nature and the expanding conductivity of effect that is explored by Chaos theorists.
The brain is capable of handling the buzz of information going on all around us... and it does. It's a simple physical survival mechanism that disallows this information from reaching one's immediate awareness.
There are some who are able to tap into the perceptions created by ambient, prevailing information. These are the type of people who have stopped listening to the voice of the ego. They are open to the information offered by their experience rather than pre-emptively classifying the experience with pre-conceived notions of "what it will be like". This sort of behaviour does not allow one to be a part of the "Self Aware Universe".
RAD4921 said: