Questioning Einstein's Theories: Time to Move On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arctic Fox
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the validity of Einstein's theories, particularly in the context of modern physics and quantum mechanics. Participants express varying opinions on whether to move beyond Einstein's ideas or to uphold them as foundational to current scientific understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that Einstein's theories are flawed and suggests starting from scratch with quantum mechanics integrated, questioning the creativity of the scientific community.
  • Another participant defends relativity, stating that it has been validated over decades and is essential to modern physics, implying that the progression from classical mechanics to quantum field theory has built upon Einstein's work.
  • Several participants challenge the notion that Einstein's theories are holding back scientific progress, asking for specific examples of how he is wrong and emphasizing the lack of solid proof against his theories.
  • One participant suggests that while Einstein's theories may not be complete, they are still the best available frameworks and can be refined rather than discarded.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of recognizing both the successes and potential shortcomings of Einstein's contributions, noting that public perception often elevates him to an untouchable status.
  • A metaphorical story is shared to illustrate the idea of moving beyond rigid adherence to established beliefs, suggesting that questioning and experimentation should be encouraged.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement on the validity and relevance of Einstein's theories, with some advocating for a reevaluation and others defending their continued importance. No consensus is reached regarding whether to discard or uphold his theories.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that while quantum mechanics and general relativity are not fully reconciled, this does not warrant discarding either theory. There is an emphasis on the need for further exploration and refinement rather than outright rejection.

Arctic Fox
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
[yelling into a bullhorn]
Not all of einstein’s theories are correct!
Now, let’s move on, shall we?!
[/yelling]

I really feel as if the scientific community’s creativity is being held back by the theories of one person. I think it’s time to forget Einstein’s somewhat flawed theories and start from scratch - this time with quantum mechanics involved.

Comments, suggestions, flames? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, since we're venting...

Arctic Fox said:
Comments, suggestions, flames? :)

Yeah, this is a dumb idea. First of all, what do you mean, "This time with quantum mechanics involved...?" Just what do you think physicists have been doing for the last nine decades? The progression from Newton has gone from QM to relativistic QM (which is more accurate than QM, by the way) to QFT (which also uses SR, by the way).

Relativity is here to stay. Why do you think that is? Because it's wrong, but we like it anyway? No, it's here to stay because it works.
 
Why is Einstein wrong? Or are you just want to argue with people just for the sake of disargeeing and making other people mad? You got anything other to say? Any proof? Any reason why you don't like Einstein? How is he holding us back? Well?
 
A better way to put it might be to leave space for questioning/experimenting rather than always take modern physics beliefs for granted?
 
I don't recall any of us being held back by the theories of one man. It's just that we haven't found any solid and acceptable proof to tell us that he's wrong.
Perhaps you should tell us how Einstein was wrong, before we start working another new theory from scratch?
 
I don't see where anyone has taken anything for granted. Scientists explore every conceivable means to invalidate new theories. They test every twist and turn in every argument. The reason QM and GR are still 'popular' is because they have passed every test designed to invalidate them. They are not complete, most everyone would agree with that. But, they work and are the best we have until proven otherwise. QM and GR have not yet been reconciled. That is no reason to discard either of them. I think a few tweaks can fix that without blowing either theory out of the water.
 
I have heard Christian Crackpot Theories that hinge upon "God does not play dice..."

I think it's important to understand where Einstein was correct - which includes nearly everything he proposed in SR & GR - and where he may have been wrong. Einstein has come to symbolize "genius and unlimited wisdom" to the common man, to the extent that people will not accept that he is fallible.

"If this is what Einstein said, it can't be wrong !" Unfortunately, you end up hearing this line more in the context of Determinism than in the context of Relativity.
 
Arctic Fox said:
I think it’s time to forget Einstein’s somewhat flawed theories...Comments, suggestions, flames? :)

The problem is that you aren't forgetting them, or him.

Here's a tale you may take a moral out of:

Two monks, hindu and buddhist, were walking together in the countryside. They arrived at a river where a young (and not uncomely) woman was waiting. She pleaded with the two men that she be carried across the river, because it looked deep and she was afraid. The hindu backed away from the woman in fear of being corrupted. The buddhist with no hesitation put the woman on his shoulders and proceeded to cross the river. The hindu was flabbergasted but followed behind the two at some distance. After the woman was set down on the opposite shore of the river, the two monks continued on their way in silence. Finally the hindu could stand it no longer. "Why did you carry that woman? You know that we monks aren't supposed to touch women!" The buddhist quietly replied "Put her down! I did an hour ago." :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
17K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 204 ·
7
Replies
204
Views
41K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K