University of South Carolina's Nuclear Program

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of the University of South Carolina's (USC) nuclear engineering graduate program, with participants sharing their perspectives on its robustness compared to other established programs. The conversation includes considerations for prospective students regarding their specific goals, interests in nuclear engineering, and the potential benefits of pursuing degrees at different institutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that USC's nuclear engineering program is not very robust and recommend considering more established programs unless there is a specific reason to choose USC.
  • Questions are raised about the prospective student's goals for graduate school, including whether they are seeking a terminal master's degree or a master's/PhD, and what their field of interest is within nuclear engineering.
  • One participant expresses interest in USC's online master's program while also considering NC State's online MS in Mechanical Engineering, particularly with a focus on heat and mass transfer.
  • Concerns are voiced about the necessity of advanced degrees for R&D positions at vendors or national labs, with some arguing that a PhD is often required for serious research roles.
  • Recommendations are made for attending reputed universities for a PhD, with a list of institutions that are noted for their strong nuclear engineering programs, including Wisconsin, MIT, Michigan, Texas, NCSU, UTK, Georgia Tech, Purdue, and Oregon State.
  • Some participants question the value of a degree from USC compared to top-ranked programs, suggesting that many state schools in the top 20 have similar standards and could be viable alternatives.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of not over-specializing and considering a broader educational background, with one participant leaning towards a master's in Mechanical Engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the quality of USC's nuclear engineering program, with some advocating for its consideration and others recommending against it in favor of more established programs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall value of a degree from USC compared to other institutions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the robustness of USC's program, varying opinions on the necessity of advanced degrees for specific career paths, and differing views on the importance of specialization versus a broader educational approach.

caldweab
Messages
260
Reaction score
9
Do you guys think USC has a decent nuclear engineering graduate program or should I consider somewhere else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
USC nuclear engineering graduate program is not a very robust program. It has been around for a few years, but unless you have a specific reason for going there I'd recommend going to more established programs.

Of course, the real questions are: What are you wanting to go to graduate school for? Terminal Masters? Masters/PhD? What is your field of interest in nuclear engineering? What is your initial degree in? Are you trying to do a distance masters degree?
 
Thermalne said:
USC nuclear engineering graduate program is not a very robust program. It has been around for a few years, but unless you have a specific reason for going there I'd recommend going to more established programs.

Of course, the real questions are: What are you wanting to go to graduate school for? Terminal Masters? Masters/PhD? What is your field of interest in nuclear engineering? What is your initial degree in? Are you trying to do a distance masters degree?

Yes I was interested in their masters of engineering program, and doing it online. I'll have a bachelors in Nuclear Engineering with a minor in physics and applied math next may. I just want to work while I work on a masters, not really interested in staying in school another 1.5 years. I was also thinking of doing NC States's online MS in Mechanical engineering with a focus in heat and mass transfer since the whole purpose of the reactor is to generate useful heat energy or going with their M.Eng. in Nuclear Engineering.
 
caldweab said:
Yes I was interested in their masters of engineering program, and doing it online. I'll have a bachelors in Nuclear Engineering with a minor in physics and applied math next may. I just want to work while I work on a masters, not really interested in staying in school another 1.5 years. I was also thinking of doing NC States's online MS in Mechanical engineering with a focus in heat and mass transfer since the whole purpose of the reactor is to generate useful heat energy or going with their M.Eng. in Nuclear Engineering.

I'd highly recommend going with NCSU ME program if you are planning on doing Heat and Mass transfer related work or any other related masters program in Mechanical Engineering. Also, what is your reason for getting a masters in engineering? Why type of job are you trying to get? Utility? Vendor? Third Party? Depending on where would make getting a masters in ME or NE completely useless and a massive waste of money.
 
Eventually I want to work in R&D at either a vendor or national lab. Duke energy flat out said you don't need advanced degrees to move up there but they do support getting them, and I really don't want to be trapped at a power plant for my whole career
 
caldweab said:
Eventually I want to work in R&D at either a vendor or national lab. Duke energy flat out said you don't need advanced degrees to move up there but they do support getting them, and I really don't want to be trapped at a power plant for my whole career

If you want to do R&D at a Vendor or National Lab, you'll more than likely need a PhD in Nuclear Engineering or related field. The days of being able to do heavy R&D at a vendor with a master's degree is long gone. There are some isolated cases, but most people at large vendors in the R&D groups are PhDs. If you have a desire to do research then you need to heavily consider applying for a full masters program in NE or programs that do work related to it. The nuclear field, more specifically nuclear energy is doing very poorly state side. I'd recommend getting an advanced degree before things pick up again.
 
To add to what Thermalne said, if you want to do hardcore R & D at a vendor or national lab then I would highly recommend physically going (instead of an online program) to a reputed university such as Wisconsin, MIT, Michigan or Texas for a PhD.
 
nukapprentice said:
To add to what Thermalne said, if you want to do hardcore R & D at a vendor or national lab then I would highly recommend physically going (instead of an online program) to a reputed university such as Wisconsin, MIT, Michigan or Texas for a PhD.

Or NCSU, UTK, Georgia Tech, Purdue, and Oregon State. The listed schools have very healthy nuclear engineering programs and are expanding their programs very heavily. (Except for Purdue and Georgia Tech, but they are based in amazing colleges of engineering and have very notable professors/research there.) Although I wouldn't encourage someone to use the graduate rankings on the USnews website (http://grad-schools.usnews.rankings...ineering-schools/nuclear-engineering-rankings) they do show the strongest (research) programs in the top ten. Excluding a few based on my own opinion, most of the top 10-15 are worth their salt in their programs and have a lot of good things going for them. I'd heavily avoid programs that have less than 7 professors (critical mass for a nuclear department) or do not have a good range of research. If you are very interested in the thermal hydraulics side of nuclear engineering please heavily consider Texas A&M, Oregon State University, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MIT, and NCSU. Sorry for the Wall o text.
 
Thermalne said:
Or NCSU, UTK, Georgia Tech, Purdue, and Oregon State. The listed schools have very healthy nuclear engineering programs and are expanding their programs very heavily. (Except for Purdue and Georgia Tech, but they are based in amazing colleges of engineering and have very notable professors/research there.) Although I wouldn't encourage someone to use the graduate rankings on the USnews website (http://grad-schools.usnews.rankings...ineering-schools/nuclear-engineering-rankings) they do show the strongest (research) programs in the top ten. Excluding a few based on my own opinion, most of the top 10-15 are worth their salt in their programs and have a lot of good things going for them. I'd heavily avoid programs that have less than 7 professors (critical mass for a nuclear department) or do not have a good range of research. If you are very interested in the thermal hydraulics side of nuclear engineering please heavily consider Texas A&M, Oregon State University, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MIT, and NCSU. Sorry for the Wall o text.

That's great but those are very competetive schools and what would you say if an applicant were rejected from most/all of the top tens? Do you think USC would be a completely worthless degree and a PhD in N.E. would not be worth doing unless it was at one of those top tens you mentioned?
 
  • #10
Hercuflea said:
That's great but those are very competetive schools and what would you say if an applicant were rejected from most/all of the top tens? Do you think USC would be a completely worthless degree and a PhD in N.E. would not be worth doing unless it was at one of those top tens you mentioned?

Honestly, a lot of the top 20 schools in Nuclear Engineering are state schools with similar standards. If you can't get into any of the top ten, you might have to evaluate why you're having problems getting into any of those schools. The schools lining the 11-20 spots are all pretty reasonable schools with somewhat healthly programs and would be worth going to. I'd recommend going to University of Florida or University of New Mexico before I'd suggest going to USC's program. I'm not saying you couldn't be successful going USC's nuclear program either.
 
  • #11
Well my other option was NC State for MS Mechanical Engineering (Mass and Heat Transfer) or MS Nuclear Engineering. I've heard it's best to round yourself out, and don't over specialize, so I'm leaning towards the MS Mechanical Engineering
 
  • #12
caldweab said:
Well my other option was NC State for MS Mechanical Engineering (Mass and Heat Transfer) or MS Nuclear Engineering. I've heard it's best to round yourself out, and don't over specialize, so I'm leaning towards the MS Mechanical Engineering

That's entirely dependent on what you are looking to do. NCSU has a great program either way.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K