Why Does Length Contraction Affect Only Dimensions Parallel to Motion?

Click For Summary
Length contraction occurs only in dimensions parallel to motion due to the relativity of simultaneity, which affects how distances are measured in different frames of reference. When measuring length, two events must be simultaneous in the observer's frame, but this simultaneity is altered for events along the direction of motion. In contrast, events occurring perpendicular to the motion remain simultaneous across different frames, leading to no contraction in those dimensions. The fundamental principle is that only the lengths parallel to the direction of travel experience contraction because of the differing perceptions of simultaneity. Thus, lengths perpendicular to motion remain unchanged.
georgeh
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I have a h.w. problem that states:
Explain WHY only the lengths parallel to motion shrink and why lengths perpendicular don't shrink.

I know that the vector component of the velocity for an object moving in straight line would be changing. This change only occurs on the x-axis and the not the y. But i am not sure how to extrapolate from that, Or i may be heading the wrong direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your question, I am assuming that you already understand why lengths parallel to motion shrink... and the issue is why just the parallel length and not the perpendicular lengths.

Assume horizontal motion on this page.
Consider two aligned vertically-oriented metersticks, call them A on the left and B on the right, with different horizontal velocities, approaching each other ...with nails at each end of their metersticks intended to scrape the other meterstick as they pass.

Study the problem from A's inertial frame.
Make your assumption about what should happen.
Then study from B's inertial frame.
 
I'm not sure what your teacher wants, but I would find the velocity perpendicular to the motion (v=0), and then use that value to calculate the perpendicular length contraction. You might get more credit if you use robphy's method though.
 
Last edited:
georgeh said:
I have a h.w. problem that states:
Explain WHY only the lengths parallel to motion shrink and why lengths perpendicular don't shrink.

I know that the vector component of the velocity for an object moving in straight line would be changing. This change only occurs on the x-axis and the not the y. But i am not sure how to extrapolate from that, Or i may be heading the wrong direction
This is a good question. It brings out the fundmental reason for length contraction: Length measurement depends on simultanaeity of events (ie. where the ends are at a particular time).

Two events are required to measure length. These are necessarily simultaneous in the measuring frame. If the same events are not simultaneous in the frame of reference of the object being measured, the measurements of length will differ.

Events that occur simultaneously in the moving frame in positions separated by a distance perpendicular to the direction of travel will be perceived by an observer in the rest frame to be simultaneous also. This is because light signals from those points that are received simultaneously by an observer in the moving frame who is equidistant from those points will reach the rest observer who is equidistant from those points also at the same time.

However, events that occur simultaneouisly in the moving frame in positions separated by a distance parallel to the direction of travel will not be perceived by an observer in the rest frame to be simultaneous (the classic Einstein moving train gedanken experiment).

Because simultanaeity differs only for events separated by a distance in the direction of travel, measurement of distance will differ only for distances parallel to the direction of travel.

AM
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K