How Does Water Concentration Impact Chemical Reactions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of water concentration on chemical reactions, exploring concepts of concentration, the calculation of moles in water, and the implications of water's role as a solvent in reaction dynamics. Participants examine both theoretical and practical aspects of concentration in relation to water and its effects on reaction quotients and equilibrium constants.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that concentration is a measure of how much of a substance is mixed with another, suggesting that water concentration can be calculated even in pure water.
  • Others provide a mathematical approach to determine the number of moles of water per volume, using the conversion of grams to moles.
  • A participant questions the rationale behind using the molar mass of water in calculations, prompting further clarification about the definition of concentration.
  • There is a discussion about the differing values of pKw, with some stating that it can be presented as either 14 or 15.7 depending on whether water concentration is assumed constant or variable.
  • One participant corrects another by clarifying the definitions of pKw and Kw, emphasizing that pKw is a logarithmic expression of Kw.
  • Another participant elaborates on the dissociation of water and the implications of including water concentration in the equilibrium constant calculations, presenting a detailed derivation of pKw.
  • Some participants highlight that while the assumption of constant water concentration is generally sufficient for practical applications, there are scenarios where precise measurements may reveal changes in water concentration.
  • A later reply discusses the relevance of concentration in the context of water as a solvent, emphasizing the importance of spatial density of solvated molecules in reaction dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the treatment of water concentration in chemical reactions, particularly in relation to the values of pKw and the assumptions made in calculations. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached on the implications of varying water concentration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for differing interpretations of concentration, the dependence on definitions of pKw and Kw, and the unresolved nature of how water concentration impacts reaction dynamics in various contexts.

Aya
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
my answer would be yes because, a concentration is the measure of how much of a given substance there is mixed with another substance, so aslong as the water is mixed with something elce you can measure the concentation of water right?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Concentration is a measure of the amount of a substance per volume.

For water you can do a bit of conversions to determine the number of moles per volume:

[tex]\frac{1000\ \texterm{g}}{1\ \texterm{L}} \times \frac{1\ \texterm{mol}}{18\ g} = 55.56 \frac{\texterm{mo}l}{\texterm{L}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
^ why do you mulitply by 1mol/18g
 
Because 1 mole of water has a mass of 18 grams.

(2 hydrogens and 1 oxygen)

Edit: Of course the above calculation is just calculating the number of water molecules per volume of pure water. If you had water mixed with another substance then you would have to adjust your volume accordingly.

Now that I think about it I guess concentration implies that something is dissolved in something else, but there's nothing stopping you from calculating the number of water molecules per volume of just water. I don't know if you would call it "concentration" though.
 
Last edited:
^Thank you
 
Side effect of water concentration is that sometimes you will find pKw (water ionic product) given as 14 and sometimes as 15.7. First number is based on assumption that water concentration is constant and doesn't change, second one takes care of water concentrations adding it to reaction quotient.
 
Just as a correction to the above:

pKw is not technically the water ionic product per definition, that would be Kw. pKw is just another way of saying it.

pKw = - log Kw
 
Last edited:
Borek said:
Side effect of water concentration is that sometimes you will find pKw (water ionic product) given as 14 and sometimes as 15.7. First number is based on assumption that water concentration is constant and doesn't change, second one takes care of water concentrations adding it to reaction quotient.


Borek
--
Chemical calculators at www.chembuddy.com
equation balancer and stoichiometry calculator
www.pH-meter.info


can you show me how do you get 15.7? Why do we just ignore the concentration of solid or solution solvent and replace it as one M? I always thought the reason is because the concentration of solid or water solvent does not change much so in practice we just move it to the Kc side” such as Kw = Kc[H2O]=[H][OH]? Now I am not so sure
 
Water dissociation:

H2O -> H+ + OH-

Kw is equilibrium constant for this reaction, so it should look like

Kw = [H+ ][OH- ]/[H2O ]

It is usually assumed that [H2O ] doesn't change, so we use simplified formula

Kw = [H+ ][OH- ]

Both concentrations can be measured which allows determination of Kw constant, Kw = 10-14.

But if you decide to not ignore possible changes of water concentration you have to use full reaction quotient (you may use determined value of water ionic product in the numerator):

Kw = [H+ ][OH- ]/[H2O ] = 10-14/[H2O ]

[H2O ] = 1000/18/1L = 55.5M
(where 1000 - mas of water in 1L, 18 - molar mass)

If so
Kw = 10-14/[H2O ] = 10-14/55.5 = 1.8*10-16

pKw = -log(1.8*10-16) = 15.7

For most practical applications assumption that water concentration doesn't change is good enough - we rarely use dissociation constants determined with better precision than 2 significant digits, and with precision of 2 SD water concentration doesn't change even for 1M solutions - where thermodynamic effects are so strong that results of equilibrium calculations are already dubious (see ionic strength and activity coefficients lecture at my site). But in case of very precise potentiometric measurements (and Kw is determined for different temperatures with at least 4 SD accuracy) changes in water concentration should be easily visible in the results.
 
  • #10
We've had a related discussion about this subject a while back. When working with concentration, it's usually in reference to water as a solvent. That is water has solvated the molecules, which are themselves the agents of any reaction dynamics that might incur. The usefulness of the concentration concept is in its incorporation into equations which depend on them, which relates to the molecules that are solvated in water. Water is the particular medium, and we're really concerned about the spatial density of the solvated agents.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K