Problem - Newton's second law applied to uniform circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Newton's second law to a problem involving uniform circular motion. Participants are examining the implications of directionality in forces and accelerations, particularly in the context of centripetal acceleration and friction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the necessity of assigning negative signs to acceleration in the context of circular motion. Questions arise regarding the direction of static friction and centripetal acceleration, and whether these should be considered in the force equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of forces in circular motion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of directionality in the equations, and there is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made about the direction of forces.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's confusion regarding the sign conventions used in previous problems compared to this one. The specific setup of the problem, including the direction of motion and the nature of the forces involved, is under scrutiny.

opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem I am working on:

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/5566/image0002bv6.jpg

Here is my work:

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/7127/image0001zy6.jpg

I cannot solve (2) for v since there are no real roots.

When I set up the net forces in the x-direction in (1), should I have made ma_c negative? I think it makes sense if ma_c is negative because it tells us that the acceleration vector is always pointing in the negative x-direction.

In all of the other Newton's second law problems, I never had to make the side with ma negative. Why in this problem must I now specify the sign of the acceleration?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The minus sign just signifies direction. If the friction is negative, so is the acceleration. v^2/r gives the magnitude of the acceleration, not the direction.
 
Unless I'm missing something, the friction should point in the opposite direction, which is the answer to your problem. The force of friction always has a direction opposite to the direction of motion (or, in this case, to the direction of a force which would cause such motion).
 
opticaltempest said:
When I set up the net forces in the x-direction in (1), should I have made ma_c negative? I think it makes sense if ma_c is negative because it tells us that the acceleration vector is always pointing in the negative x-direction.
In circular motion, the acceleration does NOT always point in any direction. The centripetal accelration always points toward the center of the circle, hence the direction keeps changing. Just toss the negative anyhow, since you are only solving for the magnitude. When informing the direction, all that's needed is "toward the center of the circle."
 
Radou:

In this problem I assumed the truck was driving in a counterclockwise circle, therefore the force preventing the truck from moving in a straight line was the inward pointing f_s.

Doc Al and Chi Meson:

I think that cleared up my mistake.

So, on these specific types of problems I should not worry about including the direction of the static friction force and the direction of the centripetal acceleration in the plane containing the circle (since we already know the static friction force vector and centripetal acceleration vector always points inward at every point along the circle assuming we have uniform circular motion / constant speed)?
 
If two vectors point in the same direction, they are either both negative or both positive (depending upon your choice of coordinate system). Either way, the signs cancel. If left is negative, and the acceleration points left, then the centripetal acceleration (including proper sign) is -v^2/r, not v^2/r.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K