Problem - Newton's second law applied to uniform circular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Newton's second law to uniform circular motion, specifically addressing the confusion regarding the direction of acceleration and friction. Participants clarify that the centripetal acceleration always points toward the center of the circle, and its magnitude can be expressed without concern for sign, as direction is inherently understood in circular motion. The importance of recognizing that both the static friction force and centripetal acceleration point inward is emphasized, which simplifies the analysis. It is noted that when two vectors share the same direction, their signs will cancel out in calculations. Overall, the focus is on correctly interpreting the forces involved in circular motion without overcomplicating the directional aspects.
opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem I am working on:

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/5566/image0002bv6.jpg

Here is my work:

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/7127/image0001zy6.jpg

I cannot solve (2) for v since there are no real roots.

When I set up the net forces in the x-direction in (1), should I have made ma_c negative? I think it makes sense if ma_c is negative because it tells us that the acceleration vector is always pointing in the negative x-direction.

In all of the other Newton's second law problems, I never had to make the side with ma negative. Why in this problem must I now specify the sign of the acceleration?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The minus sign just signifies direction. If the friction is negative, so is the acceleration. v^2/r gives the magnitude of the acceleration, not the direction.
 
Unless I'm missing something, the friction should point in the opposite direction, which is the answer to your problem. The force of friction always has a direction opposite to the direction of motion (or, in this case, to the direction of a force which would cause such motion).
 
opticaltempest said:
When I set up the net forces in the x-direction in (1), should I have made ma_c negative? I think it makes sense if ma_c is negative because it tells us that the acceleration vector is always pointing in the negative x-direction.
In circular motion, the acceleration does NOT always point in any direction. The centripetal accelration always points toward the center of the circle, hence the direction keeps changing. Just toss the negative anyhow, since you are only solving for the magnitude. When informing the direction, all that's needed is "toward the center of the circle."
 
Radou:

In this problem I assumed the truck was driving in a counterclockwise circle, therefore the force preventing the truck from moving in a straight line was the inward pointing f_s.

Doc Al and Chi Meson:

I think that cleared up my mistake.

So, on these specific types of problems I should not worry about including the direction of the static friction force and the direction of the centripetal acceleration in the plane containing the circle (since we already know the static friction force vector and centripetal acceleration vector always points inward at every point along the circle assuming we have uniform circular motion / constant speed)?
 
If two vectors point in the same direction, they are either both negative or both positive (depending upon your choice of coordinate system). Either way, the signs cancel. If left is negative, and the acceleration points left, then the centripetal acceleration (including proper sign) is -v^2/r, not v^2/r.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top