How to differentiate (sinx)^2?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter strokebow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the function (sinx)^2, exploring various methods and approaches, including the chain rule and power reduction formulas. Participants engage in technical reasoning and clarification regarding differentiation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to differentiate (sinx)^2.
  • Another suggests using the chain rule, letting u = sinx, and finding d/dx(u^2).
  • Some participants propose recalling the power reduction formula sin^2θ = (1 - cos 2θ)/2 as a potential method for simplification.
  • There is a discussion about the usefulness of the power reduction formula for both differentiation and integration, with differing opinions on its effectiveness.
  • One participant argues that using the chain rule on the double angle form may complicate the differentiation process.
  • Another counters that they prefer single angle arguments for clarity, although they acknowledge that both forms are equivalent.
  • Several participants express that the choice between single and double angle forms may not significantly impact the time taken to differentiate.
  • There is a light-hearted comment about avoiding an extensive debate on the merits of single versus double angle solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the preferred methods for differentiating (sinx)^2, particularly regarding the use of single versus double angle forms. No consensus is reached on which approach is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential complexity of using double angle arguments and the need to remember specific expansions, which may not be straightforward for all. The discussion reflects varying preferences and assumptions about differentiation techniques.

strokebow
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
How do you differentiate the likes of (sinx)^2

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the chain rule. Let u=sinx, then you need to find d/dx(u^2).
 
Alternatively, you can recall / derive the power reduction formulae such as;

\sin^2\theta = \frac{1 - \cos 2\theta}{2}

These are especially useful when integrating such functions.
 
Hootenanny said:
Alternatively, you can recall / derive the power reduction formulae such as;

\sin^2\theta = \frac{1 - \cos 2\theta}{2}

These are especially useful when integrating such functions.

Differentiating, not integrating. :biggrin:
 
I Think Hootenanny was in fact intended to use that to simplify the differentiation, if I'm reading his last sentence correctly >.<...Well anyway It doesn't really help very much because we still have to use the chain rule on the cos 2theta.
 
Gib Z said:
I Think Hootenanny was in fact intended to use that to simplify the differentiation, if I'm reading his last sentence correctly >.<...Well anyway It doesn't really help very much because we still have to use the chain rule on the cos 2theta.
Not at all, I meant that the formulae are useful for differentiation, but more so for integration. It is true that to differentiate you may have to use the chain rule for both forms but I find it easier to remember that;

\frac{d}{dx}\sin(ax) dx = a\cos(ax)

\int \sin(ax) dx = -\frac{1}{a}\cos(ax) + C

Rather than remembering the results for the sin2x etc. In any event applying the chain rule to something of the form sin(ax) is somewhat simpler than applying it to something of the form sin2x don't you think?
 
Last edited:
Not always, usaully one would like an answer without double angled arguments, so they would have to know the expansion of cos(2theta) which isn't as easy as bringing a power down times the derivative of sin x.
 
Gib Z said:
Not always, usaully one would like an answer without double angled arguments, so they would have to know the expansion of cos(2theta) which isn't as easy as bringing a power down times the derivative of sin x.
Fair point perhaps, but I've never come across a case where a single angle argument is preferable to a double angle. In any case, the double angle form is certainly much easier to integrate.
 
Of course there all equivalent, but I always prefer putting my answers in terms in single angled arguments. In the end it makes very little difference, maybe 5 seconds working time.
 
  • #10
= 2sinx cosx
= sin2x :zzz:
 
  • #11
DAKONG said:
= 2sinx cosx
= sin2x :zzz:

ditto..


w00t 1st post :P
 
  • #12
Let's try not to get into a 12 page debate on the merits of single vs. double angle final form solutions
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K