What is the history behind Witch Balls and how are they made?

In summary, the conversation provides little information about how the glass ornaments are inserted into the bulbs.
  • #1
Andre
4,311
74
Bought these two glass bulbs at a local art fair, the other month

bulb1.JPG



bulb2.JPG


Size and shape as in Christmass tree balls, of hand blown glass but with a complex delicate glass object inside.

Looks like ship in a bottle, but how do you get an object like that inside during the glass blowing process?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can first produce a glass sphere (the easiest shape to blow) or cylinder, cut it open, insert the ornament and reheat the shell to melt the tips of the filaments on the ornament and seal the bulb.
 
  • #3
turbo-1 said:
You can first produce a glass sphere (the easiest shape to blow) or cylinder, cut it open, insert the ornament and reheat the shell to melt the tips of the filaments on the ornament and seal the bulb.
I don't think they cut the bulb open to insert the ornament.

I suspect they keep a hole open in the end of the bulb and build the ornament within it.

One piece of evidence of this is that, if they could build the ornament free of the constraints of the bulb, it would likely be a MUCH more complex and skillfully made ornament. The fact that the ornament is quite ... freeform ... suggests to me that the creation process is extremely compromised - like, say because they're being constructed ship-in-a-bottle-style.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
DaveC426913 said:
I'm not sure they cut it open to insert the ornament.
Look at the top ornament and notice the flattened thicker glass at the top right. That's probably where the initial bottle/bulb was opened. They would have to use a large opening to insert the ornaments with all those thin glass filaments. Then as they reheated the bulb to reform it and seal it, the bulb contracted against the tips of the filaments and melted them.
 
  • #5
turbo-1 said:
Look at the top ornament and notice the flattened thicker glass at the top right. That's probably where the initial bottle/bulb was opened. They would have to use a large opening to insert the ornaments with all those thin glass filaments. Then as they reheated the bulb to reform it and seal it, the bulb contracted against the tips of the filaments and melted them.

I sort of agree with you---to add a little---it may have been a tube of glass where that inner item or really the hobnails of it touched the inner walls, when the tube was reheated, one end closed, and blown to expand to become round, the expansion pulled the hobnails that had attached to the inner walls to string--then the end was closed.
 
  • #6
I wonder if it's more that they used something with a slightly higher melting temperature for the inner "glob" and surrounded it by the glass before blowing to get the glass to stick to some of it. Those fine spindles attaching the glob to the sides look way too thin and in the second one, too numerous, to have been placed individually in a cut piece.

Of course, we wouldn't have to be guessing if Andre had just asked the artist when he bought them at the fair. :biggrin: I've never had trouble getting an artist to tell me more about their work at an art fair...I have had trouble getting them to STOP telling me more about their work.
 
  • #7
Moonbear said:
I wonder if it's more that they used something with a slightly higher melting temperature for the inner "glob" and surrounded it by the glass before blowing to get the glass to stick to some of it. Those fine spindles attaching the glob to the sides look way too thin and in the second one, too numerous, to have been placed individually in a cut piece.

Of course, we wouldn't have to be guessing if Andre had just asked the artist when he bought them at the fair. :biggrin: I've never had trouble getting an artist to tell me more about their work at an art fair...I have had trouble getting them to STOP telling me more about their work.

he probably did---and just want to check how far we can be off with 'guesses'
 
  • #8
rewebster said:
it may have been a tube of glass where that inner item or really the hobnails of it touched the inner walls

Now that sounds like the best explanation so far. Start blowing the globe, then insert the center part when there's room to get air around it to only blow the outside, but still small enough to allow contact.

I wonder if the rest of the artist's collection had a lot of green glass in it, from remelting all the ones where the inner piece didn't stick where it was supposed to. :biggrin:

I like how the first one looks like pickles inside it.
 
  • #9
I knew and hung around a glass blower 'artist' ---amazing use of the plasticity

--------------

I have a small collection of art glass too, and have read about Tiffany, Loetz, Pairpoint, etc.

---------------

I've tried to make some stuff--all you need is some tools and a propane torch
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Moonbear said:
Now that sounds like the best explanation so far. Start blowing the globe, then insert the center part
Question: if they were going to insert the inner piece in anything like partly-assembled condition, there would be virtually no limit on how much care and attention they could put into it before inserting. Instead of an amorphous blob of colour, why wouldn't they be inserting fully fiinished pieces like hummingbirds and beautiful flowers? I mean, that inner shape, - if you took it out of the bulb thus and out-of-context - is not exactly state-of the art blowing.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
Question: if they were going to insert the inner piece in anything like partly-assembled condition, there would be virtually no limit on how much care and attention they could put into it before inserting. Instead of an amorphous blob of colour, why wouldn't they be inserting fully fiinished pieces like hummingbirds and beautiful flowers? I mean, that inner shape, - if you took it out of the bulb thus and out-of-context - is not exactly state-of the art blowing.

it came out of an art fair --not an art gallery---those may not have cost more than $20-30 each---I bet the artist did have more expensive items, too
 
  • #12
No, she was happy to talk a lot but not how she did it. The only thing the artist told that she needed some 15 years to get to this result. She showed earlier work in which the fibres connecting the bulb with the ornament clearly distorted the round shape quite a bit.

These were among the first 'round'ones.
 
  • #13
then, she may have had to find a way to shrink/vacuum the tube down against the hobnails--then, when connected to the inner walls, enlarge and pull the fibers making the threading in the ball --all while not melting the fibers and still hot enough to be able to blow it into a ball shape
 
  • #14
My guess is that the inner part was a small "billet" of glass that had the outer glass wrapped around it at the end of a tube. The tube would have an inner and outer flow path. The two are heated together to make them flow. Air is introduced in the outer flow path to get the outer sphere to start growing. Air is then introduced into the inner at a slower rate.

I am guessing that the strands that go from the inner to the outer surface are created while still hot by poking a sharp tool through the outer and into the inner part. The tool is then pulled back out, pulling the inner strand with it.

That's my guess anyways.

Those are really cool looking ornaments. My wife would LOVE one of those.
 
  • #15
okay i'll see if I can trace her back and see what's possible.
 
  • #16
Andre said:
okay i'll see if I can trace her back and see what's possible.
I think they're beautiful, especially the top one, which has a kinda venus fly trap thing going on, and I can see that the fibers attached to the inside wall must be a very difficult effect to achieve.
 
  • #17
FredGarvin said:
My guess is that the inner part was a small "billet" of glass that had the outer glass wrapped around it at the end of a tube. The tube would have an inner and outer flow path. The two are heated together to make them flow. Air is introduced in the outer flow path to get the outer sphere to start growing. Air is then introduced into the inner at a slower rate.

I am guessing that the strands that go from the inner to the outer surface are created while still hot by poking a sharp tool through the outer and into the inner part. The tool is then pulled back out, pulling the inner strand with it.


I suspect that you're right about the first part (two concentric layers of blowing) but that the strands are made by inserting a molten rod of glass in through the neck, then letting it touch the inside and stick and then pulling it away.
 
  • #18
I think that the inner decoration was pieced together with glass rods extending from all directions. The initial envelope was opened to insert that decoration, and then the envelope was reheated. Such an envelope will contract due to surface tension unless the glass-worker can blow into the envelope and expand it. Once the envelope (bulb/enclosure) is sealed on the open end, the artisan can continue to heat it so that the envelope bonds with the glass rods projecting from the inner decoration, and gently blow it while heating to take advantage of glass' viscosity and draw out those thin filaments.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
Question: if they were going to insert the inner piece in anything like partly-assembled condition, there would be virtually no limit on how much care and attention they could put into it before inserting. Instead of an amorphous blob of colour, why wouldn't they be inserting fully fiinished pieces like hummingbirds and beautiful flowers? I mean, that inner shape, - if you took it out of the bulb thus and out-of-context - is not exactly state-of the art blowing.

Maybe she hasn't gotten that good at it yet. :biggrin: Or, maybe putting something more "shapely" into the center doesn't work, because it melts partially and loses its shape. Or maybe she just liked the amorphous blobs better than something like hummingbirds and flowers. :biggrin: That could be why she sells her "craft" at a fair instead of at a gallery, because she's not good enough at it yet...some people at art fairs really are artists, others are more crafters who do these things as hobbies, so not enough to open a shop or sell them through other venues. Obviously, enough people like them to buy them, and that's really all that counts in the end. I'd have probably skipped them because they look too fragile to survive my not-so-tender loving care, or the cat who is already plotting to attack the Christmas tree when it isn't even set up yet, :uhh: but I think otherwise, I'd rather have an interesting, amorphous "blob" than a cliched hummingbird or flower. So, I could see it going either way, that she chose the more amorphous approach because her skills aren't yet sufficient to accomplish better (glass blowing can take decades to master), or because she just found it more aesthetically appealing for its uniqueness.

It would be cool if Andre is able to contact the artist and find out more about the technique or reasoning behind the choice of center.
 
  • #20
These kinds of glass orbs are several hundred years old, and are known as Witch Balls.
It was thought that a witch entering the home, would be so inraptured by them that the evil soul would be cought up in them, and trapped. It was common to find them hanging in windows of even the poorest homes. The antique balls sell for hundreds of dollars, new ones around 30.
Andres, is very nicely made, to keep in mind how hard it is..remember that blown glass has to kept spinning on the pontil !

Here's a look at some colorful ones.

http://www.whiteelks.com/witchball.htm
 
Last edited:

1. What is the origin of Witch Balls?

The origin of Witch Balls can be traced back to 17th century England. It is believed that they were originally created as a way to ward off evil spirits and protect homes from witchcraft.

2. How were Witch Balls traditionally made?

Traditionally, Witch Balls were made by glassblowers using molten glass. The glass was blown into a hollow sphere and then coated with metallic substances such as silver, copper, or lead. The ball was then reheated and spun, creating intricate patterns and designs on the surface.

3. What materials are used to make Witch Balls?

The main material used to make Witch Balls is glass. However, different types of glass can be used such as clear, colored, or iridescent. Metallic substances like silver, copper, and lead are also used to create the reflective surface of the ball.

4. How are Witch Balls used?

Witch Balls are traditionally hung in windows or doorways as a form of protection against negative energy and spirits. They were believed to capture and trap any evil spirits or curses that may be directed towards the home. Some modern uses for Witch Balls include decoration, garden ornaments, and meditation aids.

5. Are Witch Balls still made today?

Yes, Witch Balls are still made today and are popular among collectors and those interested in the history of witchcraft. They can be found in various sizes, colors, and designs, and are often sold as decorative items or as tools for spiritual practices.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
67
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
25K
Back
Top